No, not by any means. People took sides. There were divided loyalties, brother fought brother, father fought son. The armies moved from place to place, recruiting and encouraging the populous. But the size of the forces involved is remarkably small, battles are over & done with in a day, there are no long campaigns. Which therefore suggests that while the military were doing what they did everyone else was just getting on with day to day life.
The English Civil War lasted from August 22, 1642 to September 3, 1651. The fight was between the Royalists and the Parliamentarians, with the Parliamentarians getting the victory.
English Civil war
Yes, because the civil war was well after the revalutionary war. So then America was already a free country which ment the patriots had won and now everyone was neither a patriot nor a loyalists.
No England took over India without a fight with the Germans.
Women did not fight in the Civil War. But, some did dress up like men to help out in the war.
fight
The English Civil War lasted from August 22, 1642 to September 3, 1651. The fight was between the Royalists and the Parliamentarians, with the Parliamentarians getting the victory.
dangerous
English Civil war
People who lead others in a fight for equality amongst everyone.
cause he wanted to
The English Civil War was fought over two different ways of ruling the country. Monarchy - the King Sort of democracy - Parliament
Slaves would fight for England. Not sure that I see the relevance, please explain. Was England significantly involved in the American Civil War, which, I assume, is what we are discussing?
It was a fight for the throne between Stephen of Blois and Matilda.
abey gadhey kuch ata jata hai tumhe
The Cavaliers were the supporters of the king - King Charles I. The other name used for them is 'Royalists'.
He did not fight for civil WAR! he fought for civil RIGHTS and liberties