advantags are,, ppl will scare if u have the most distructive weapon , they wont simplay just go to war with u >> so that good!!!! the other hand is ppl will try to invent more distructive weap-on to overtake u .. if ther is a war really ahppen they.. will be all dead!!!!!
They had factories to produce lots of weapons, however they lacked adaquate farming. A commodity of which the south was abundant.
Atomic BombsNapalm BombsImproved fire weapons both troop size and on tanksJetsNewer and bigger planes and bomber planesRadar (not a weapon but aided the war)SONAR (improved from WW1)Missiles (self flying bombs like Hitler used on England)The Germans introduced a lot of new weapons but the list is long.The Japanese introduced the concept of suicide bombing
The three main weapons introduced in WWII, were better and new weapons, stronger tanks such as the Panzer, Tiger, King Tiger E.T.C. They also developed new tactics during this war called the Blitzkriek, another weapon introduced was the new fighter aircraft, ex: P51 D mustang, MK40 Spitfire, Stuka, BF 109, and bombers,. The new bombers introduced in this time was like the Henkels, and B-29'S. Make sense?
President Truman's decision to use atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 had significant advantages and disadvantages. The primary advantage was that it likely expedited the end of World War II, potentially saving millions of lives that would have been lost in a prolonged ground invasion of Japan. However, the disadvantages included the immense civilian casualties and long-term suffering caused by radiation, as well as the ethical implications of using such destructive weapons. Additionally, the bombings set a precedent for nuclear warfare, contributing to an arms race during the Cold War.
Knights' armor provided significant advantages, such as enhanced protection against weapons, which allowed them to engage in battle with greater confidence and safety. The rigid design also helped to intimidate opponents. However, the disadvantages included its considerable weight, which could hinder mobility and stamina, and the complexity of donning and doffing the armor, making it cumbersome during prolonged engagements or in non-combat situations. Additionally, the heat and lack of ventilation could lead to discomfort or exhaustion during battles.
its big and heavy but very painfull
Both countries have excellent weapons, both have advantages and disadvantages of their own.
Advantages included access to new goods, weapons, and technology. However, disadvantages included loss of land, disease epidemics, warfare, and forced assimilation into European culture.
They had factories to produce lots of weapons, however they lacked adaquate farming. A commodity of which the south was abundant.
It introduced new weapons.
Advantages: Serve as strong deterrents against aggression, contribute to the balance of power among nations, and can provide leverage in negotiations. Disadvantages: High potential for catastrophic consequences if used, risk of proliferation to unstable or hostile states, and cost of maintenance and disarmament efforts.
I hate nuclear weapons. There are only disadvantages. Ever heard of Chernobyl? Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Sellafield? Three Mile Island, a.k.a Harrisburg? Nukes suck! So many poor babies born with birth defects due to idiotic humans! Ugg! Thanks for ur Q though! :-)
572 weapons were designed. Only 242 were actually introduced and made though.
Dorians.
useful for defence
weapons
It has a certain distance for each kind of bow or crossbow or any ranged weapon. They each have their advantages and disadvantages. You should test out each weapons distance on a low level monster.