No, since noine should be afraid to voice their own opinion
Government action to suppress opposition to World War I was often justified on the grounds of national security and unity during a time of crisis. Leaders believed that dissent could undermine morale, weaken the war effort, and embolden the enemy. Additionally, the perception of external threats heightened fears of internal subversion, leading to the enactment of laws such as the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918, which aimed to stifle anti-war sentiment and protect the nation’s interests. Such measures were seen as necessary to maintain order and ensure the collective commitment to the war.
Robots were extensively used throughout business
building a modern transportation system
Passing of the Espionage Act.
Insurgency is acts of rebelling against government. Counter-insurgency is action taken specifically against insurgents.
research b_itch
people have the right to overthrow an oppressive government
His action was justified.
For fair employment in South Africa
people have the right to overthrow an oppressive government
A legal test that says government cannot lawfully suppress advocacy that promotes lawless action unless such advocacy is aimed at producing, and is likely to produce, imminent lawless action
Congress banned the importation of slaves from Africa.
idk
really...
The definition of opposition is resistance or dissent expressed by action or argument. For example, if you were to play a sport, the team you are against is your opposition.
Justified.
action-reaction forces