Become a man of the cloth, or a college professor. Those two professions are fairly traditional.
Conscientious objector status is typically granted to individuals who oppose military service on moral or religious grounds. In many countries, applicants must provide evidence of their beliefs and demonstrate that their objections are sincere and deeply held. The process often involves an interview or application review, and guidelines can vary significantly by jurisdiction. Ultimately, those granted status may be required to serve in alternative civilian roles instead of military service.
Yes, an individual can qualify as a conscientious objector if they object to a particular war based on deeply held moral, ethical, or religious beliefs. In many countries, this status is recognized for those who oppose participation in specific conflicts rather than military service as a whole. However, the criteria and processes for gaining this status can vary significantly depending on national laws and regulations. Ultimately, the individual must demonstrate that their objections are sincere and rooted in their personal convictions.
Conscientious objectors, were a class (category) of men, who when INDUCTED (conscripted/drafted) into military service, would express their beliefs that it was wrong to kill other human beings, and they themselves would prefer that the US government not put them into a situation that might call for them to have to kill or harm another human being. The majority of Conscientious Objectors accepted induction into the military, and were assigned non-combat duties (rear jobs) such as clerks, religious dutes (the Chaplin service within the military), but the vast majority of them served in the military's MEDICAL CORPS. Which unfortunately, placed many of them in harm's way, when they became MEDIC's on the battlefield's of Vietnam. The status of "Conscientious Objector" may have also reached the level of abuse, by resisting the "draft" as conscientious objectors. That status may not have been valid (for avoiding military service to their country) for the vast majority of Conscientious objectors, as the military did (and still does) have more than enough jobs (MOS's-Military Occupational Specialties) for them to maintain their beliefs of not harming their fellow human beings, while still serving their country. Consequently, many conscientious objectors were looked upon as draft evaders.
Soldiers often sought to avoid combat through various means, such as claiming medical issues or mental health problems, including PTSD, to secure discharges or reassignment. Some resorted to desertion, fleeing their units to escape deployment. Others attempted to obtain conscientious objector status, arguing that their moral or religious beliefs prevented them from participating in warfare. Additionally, some employed deception, such as faking injuries or using forged documents.
There were probably more than two. One would be 'medically unfit' - for instance, having nerve damage that limited upper arm strength. Another would be 'conscientious objector' status, generally due to a religious belief that forbids violence. A third, used frequently during the Vietnam war era, was 'successfully enrolled in higher education'.
A segregant. Expanded answer: Not a segregant. He applied for and was denied status as a Conscientious Objector.
They perform alternative service usually in medical or mental health facilities.A conscientious objector (CO) is a person that will not carry arms but will instead help out in medical, kitchen or "non-bloody" work
That was an Australian "draftee." In Vietnam, Australians called them "National Servicemen." Probably the same reasons a US male avoided service...probably a college deferment, or a conscientious objector status; and most definitely if the man was physically or mentally unfit.
To go against the Vietname War, Muhammad Ali and applied for Conscientious Objector exemption status from the draft, claiming status as a religious minister.
No, Bernie Sanders applied for conscientious objector status (he avoided it) during the Vietnam War draft, but was too old to be drafted when his number came up.
Conscientious objector status is typically granted to individuals who oppose military service on moral or religious grounds. In many countries, applicants must provide evidence of their beliefs and demonstrate that their objections are sincere and deeply held. The process often involves an interview or application review, and guidelines can vary significantly by jurisdiction. Ultimately, those granted status may be required to serve in alternative civilian roles instead of military service.
Two common ways to be exempted from the draft in the United States historically included obtaining a deferment for educational purposes, allowing students to continue their studies without interruption, and qualifying for conscientious objector status, which is granted to individuals who oppose military service on moral or religious grounds. Additionally, individuals might be exempted due to medical reasons or if they were the primary caregiver for dependents.
Yes, an individual can qualify as a conscientious objector if they object to a particular war based on deeply held moral, ethical, or religious beliefs. In many countries, this status is recognized for those who oppose participation in specific conflicts rather than military service as a whole. However, the criteria and processes for gaining this status can vary significantly depending on national laws and regulations. Ultimately, the individual must demonstrate that their objections are sincere and rooted in their personal convictions.
The US Supreme Court overturned Casius Clay's (Mohammad Ali) conviction in Clay v. United States, 403 U.S. 698 (1971), for procedural reasons.Clay was arrested and convicted in US District Court (upheld by the Fifth Circuit) for refusing to report for induction after he was drafted and denied conscientious objector status during the Vietnam War. The Court held that the government had failed to properly identify the reason for disallowing Clay's petition as a conscientious objector, and overturned the conviction.
Conscientious objectors, were a class (category) of men, who when INDUCTED (conscripted/drafted) into military service, would express their beliefs that it was wrong to kill other human beings, and they themselves would prefer that the US government not put them into a situation that might call for them to have to kill or harm another human being. The majority of Conscientious Objectors accepted induction into the military, and were assigned non-combat duties (rear jobs) such as clerks, religious dutes (the Chaplin service within the military), but the vast majority of them served in the military's MEDICAL CORPS. Which unfortunately, placed many of them in harm's way, when they became MEDIC's on the battlefield's of Vietnam. The status of "Conscientious Objector" may have also reached the level of abuse, by resisting the "draft" as conscientious objectors. That status may not have been valid (for avoiding military service to their country) for the vast majority of Conscientious objectors, as the military did (and still does) have more than enough jobs (MOS's-Military Occupational Specialties) for them to maintain their beliefs of not harming their fellow human beings, while still serving their country. Consequently, many conscientious objectors were looked upon as draft evaders.
Those who refuse serving in the military due to religious beliefs are referred to as conscientious objectors. The term also applies to those who refuse to serve due to freedom of thought or conscience.
There are many waivers that exist in the Selective Service system, including but not limited to Conscientious Objector status, which is essentially someone whose belief system does not coincide with forced military action.This would be the primary and most commonly known form of legal avoidance of draft eligibility.