Not all children enjoyed the experience of evacuation. This is mainly due to two factors, either the foster parents they were assigned, or the idea of homesickness. Many children were seen as a burden to their fosters, and alot of evacuees were not educated to many everyday things. For example, more often and not, children were not accostomed to using a knife and fork. Then there was homesickness. Children were taken away for months, even years, and so of course they were to miss their family. Many children became depressed and miserable. However, there were those lucky children that were assigned kind and caring foster parents, and made many new friends in the village that they were to live. Children learned many new skills such as reading, writing and how to ride a bike. The country life suited many children perfectly, and there are accounts of children tantalising cows or sheeps and runnning away as fast as possible as these farm animals chased them. So the conclusion of the matter is that some disliked the whole evacuation process, others loved it. It all depended on who you were, who you were assigned to, and how you took to your new environment.
Yes. Evacuation was a good idea because the children were safe in the country.
During World War II, children in Britain were primarily evacuated by train to safer rural areas away from cities targeted by bombings. Special evacuation trains, known as "evacuation trains," were used to transport large groups of children, often accompanied by teachers or guardians. Some children were also evacuated by bus or, in certain cases, by boat, particularly those living in coastal areas. The evacuation was part of a larger effort to protect the young population from the dangers of war.
evacuation was in world war 2 and started in 1939. It ended in 1946 and lasted seven yrs though some children came home earlier of 12 July 1945.
The evacuation plan during World War 2 was flawed in several ways. First of all, the government created a panic by using exaggerated figures for casualties. This panic worked against smooth moving, and caused a bottleneck in the operation. Once the children had arrived in the countryside, they found little or no preparation had been made. As a result, the children arrived at the wrong locations, had few rations, and found out there were not enough homes to accommodate the children.
Operation Pied Piper - the evacuation of children and other vulnerable people, began on 1st September 1939 long before the blitz started, but was anticipated.
Yes. Evacuation was a good idea because the children were safe in the country.
Evacuation in any city was about the same. Some children got taken to family's who took care of them and some children were treated as little slaves. Some siblings got torn apart during the evacuation process's and some children when the war was over had no family to go back to. By Tom Clarke 14
Dunkirk France. If you meant the evacuation for the children that was from London and other large cities and towns to the rural areas.
Most children went on trains to the countryside with their schools.
The main aim oevacuation was to save as many children as possible.
Evacuation of children in England.
children
Morale would have been increased with the thought of the many children being safe from bombings. With this, people would have been able to perform better with their war efforts. However, the effect of saying goodbye to one's child could also effect it in a negative way.
bulk forming laxatives
evacuation was made for children in any war to be taken to the countryside or another country for saftey. During those, many houses were bombed so it would be that if all the children were not evacuated they would probally pass away(die).
Operation Pied Piper .
It was simply called evacuation.