0
What else can I help you with?
What was more important to the Leagues failure the Manchurian crisis or the Abyssinian crisis?
the abyssinisn crisis as Mussolini was a agrressive nationlist
What were the differing responses to the manchurian crisis?
The Manchurian Crisis of September 8, 1931 (also known as the "Mukden Incident", also known as the "Manchurian Incident") resulted in the Japanese invasion of China.
What was the final result of the Venezuela-Guiana crisis with Britain?
British retreat and growing American-British friendship
Why did Britain and France fail to support Czechoslovakia during the sudeten crisis?
in 1938, Britain and France signed the Munich pact with Germany and Italy. The pact permitted German annexation of border areas of Czechoslovakia (sudetenland).
A crisis in this country in 1904 nearly led to war?
The Moroccan (Morocco) crisis. In 1904 Morocco had been given to France by Britain, but the Moroccans wanted their independence. In 1905, Germany announced her support for Moroccan independence. War was narrowly avoided by a conference which allowed France to retain possession of Morocco. However, in 1911, the Germans were again protesting against French possession of Morocco. Britain supported France and Germany was persuaded to back down for part of French Congo. (the following was used fromhttp://www.historyonthenet.com/WW1/causes.htm )
What was more important to the Leagues failure the Manchurian crisis or the Abyssinian crisis?
the abyssinisn crisis as Mussolini was a agrressive nationlist
Which of these weaknesses of the league was the most important the failure of disarmament the abyssinian crisis the manchurian crisis?
I believe that it was the Manchurian crisis, it showed everyone that a strong minded country could overpower the league. Italy took alot of notice of Manchuria and noticed the league could do nothing. This is why Italy did what they did because they knew the league was powerless. Maybe without the Manchurian crisis, Mussolini would not have acted the way that he did. The Manchurian Crisis (1931) I think shows worldwide that the League of Nation cannot really handle tough job and anything involving major countries. It shows how they are weak and ineffective in dealing such tension. Disarmament Conference (1932), well it showed how LON cannot get involve and interfere with. They basically didn't do anything and because of the failure, countries began re-arming . I think Abyssinian Crisis was the climax and the reason was because we see how two powerful country, Britain and France going behind the back of LON and created the Hoare-Laval pact with Mussolini (give 2/3 of Abyssinia to Italy.) It was leaked and people were horrified and disgusted of how they would back stab. I think its the Abyssinian Crisis :)
What were the consequences of the abyssinian crisis?
Well I don know
What was a historical event that happened in China?
The Manchurian crisis
What was the significance of the 1931 Manchurian crisis to the future of world peace?
The Manchurian crisis did not have a huge impact on world peace; however, it was the first incident leading up to the second Sino-Japanese war. The Manchurian crisis was the first invasion of the war (or, rather, before the war), and it is arguable that it led up to the WWII Japanese invasion. Manchurian crisis was japan government trying to take over chian. There plan was to make an empire.
What wan not a cause of the Manchurian Crisis in 1931?
The trains in Belgium being on time was not a cause.
What were the differing responses to the manchurian crisis?
The Manchurian Crisis of September 8, 1931 (also known as the "Mukden Incident", also known as the "Manchurian Incident") resulted in the Japanese invasion of China.
What are criticisms of the league of nations?
Interior systemThe Councel, Britain, France, Italy, Japan, had the power of decision.Unanimosity regarding votes in the Annual Meetings.Big countries such as Germany, USSR and the USA were not members of the LeagueEach member state were separate nations rendering them to act on self-centered aims and pursue selfish interest.Britain and France un able to take the lead, unable to control the Manchurian Crisis or the Abyssinian Crisis, in fear of Japan and Italy.Britain and France were unable to protect Lithuania in hope of keeping Poland as a defense against Germany.Didn't have a standing army, but relied on member states to provide military support suitably.
Why did the Abyssinian crisis cause the league to fail?
The Abyssinian crisis of 1935-1936 highlighted the weaknesses of the League of Nations, as member states failed to enforce collective security. Italy's invasion of Ethiopia revealed the League's inability to impose effective sanctions and demonstrated the reluctance of major powers, like Britain and France, to confront aggressive nations due to their own national interests. This undermined the League's credibility and authority, ultimately contributing to its failure as a mechanism for maintaining peace in the interwar period.
Which event in 1935-1936 proved that the League of Nations could not protect small nations from attack by larger ones?
The Abyssinian Crisis.
Why was the lytton report ineffective in the manchurian crisis?
It took over a year to complete, and within that time the invasion and occupation of Manchuria was complete by Japan.
Explain how the Manchurian and Abyssinian crisis damaged the League of Nations 20 marks?
A Basic answer i wrote. Manchurian was the first major failure of League of Nations in 1930. Japan had been badly hit by depression. Military leaders believed that japan should expand for more living space and raw materials. Japan chose Manchurian because it was a easy target and it belonged to china which was very weak at this time it was split by two civil war nationalism and communism and the economy was doing so bad they wanted to boost it up There was an explosion on the South Manchurian railway the japan claimed it was an act of sabotage. The league of Nations appointed the Lytton commission to investigate it took a year to report it buy by this time the invasion was complete they also, condemned japans actions the japans government agreed but the army refused.
