0
How might the outcome of WW2 have changed if the D-Day invasion had not been successful?
By the time the D-Day invasion occurred, Adolf Hitler was becoming more and more unstable in his thoughts and actions. He had visible signs of Parkinson's, and has been posthumously diagnosed with schizophrenia, drug addiction, and manic depression.
This was a psychotic man who had enormous power.
He was actually very pleased with the (beginning) D-day invasion because, as he said "we could never have taken the British in their own country, but now, they have come to us!".
Because the D-day invasion was a success for the Allied forces, Hitler realized that his troops were being over-run, and thus, began to realize that the war was coming to an end, and he was not the victor he thought he would be.
The failure of D-day for the Allied forces would have meant an invasion of England, and possibly even America!
There were U-boats that were approaching America, and Hitler and his scientists even had more advanced weapons that were in development to utilize. He also had recently come into possession of the American "mint" plates, which could have flooded America with counterfeit money, thereby destabilizing our entire economy, which would have been a disaster of epic proportions.
What else can I help you with?
What might have been the outcome of a successful invasion of Laos in 1971?
The supplies would be lost and it could be a turning point in the war
Did D-Day influence the outcome of the war?
Most definitely. Without a large-scale Allied re-invasion of Western Europe, it can be imagined that WWII might have lasted over a year longer.
What might have happened if the weather had not changed and the troops had landed a midst and fog during the d-day invasion?
Many more troops would have died on the beaches. Many paratroops would have been lost and spread over vast areas.
How might the outcome of World War 2 had been different had the Germans captured Stalingrad?
If the Germans had captured Stalingrad, it could have significantly altered the course of World War II. The loss of Stalingrad would have weakened Soviet morale and military capability, potentially allowing Axis forces to advance further into the Soviet Union. A German victory might have also secured control over vital oil supplies in the Caucasus, bolstering their resources. This shift could have prolonged the war and made a successful Allied invasion of Europe more challenging.
Would the outcome of World War 2 have been different if the allies had decided to divide the focus of their war effort equally between Europe and the pacific?
It's possible that a more balanced focus on both the European and Pacific theaters could have altered the outcome of World War II. Diverting resources equally might have prolonged the conflict in both regions, potentially allowing Axis powers to consolidate or regain momentum. However, the Allies' eventual victory in Europe and the Pacific was largely due to their industrial capacity, strategic decisions, and the distinct nature of each theater, suggesting that a divided focus might not have significantly changed the ultimate outcome.
How might the outcome of the war have changed if Day invasion had not been successful?
The Germans may have invaded Britain in 1945 id D-Day hadn't happened.
How might the outcome of the war have changed if the d-day invasion had not been successful?
The Germans may have invaded Britain in 1945 id D-Day hadn't happened.
What might have been the outcome of a successful invasion of Laos in 1971?
The supplies would be lost and it could be a turning point in the war
Anything that can be changed in an experiment that might affect the outcome.?
It is a relevant variable.
How did the eastern front effect the outcome of the Normandy invasion?
The Russian defensive tied up a German army which might have been used to defend Normandy
Did D-Day influence the outcome of the war?
Most definitely. Without a large-scale Allied re-invasion of Western Europe, it can be imagined that WWII might have lasted over a year longer.
How do you think the aim of the EU might have changed since 1957?
It might have changed because the name changed
What might have been the outcome of a successful invasio of laos in 1971?
A successful invasion of Laos in 1971 could have significantly altered the course of the Vietnam War and regional dynamics in Southeast Asia. It might have strengthened the position of the U.S. and its allies against North Vietnamese forces by disrupting their supply lines and bolstering the Royal Lao Government. This could have delayed or even prevented the eventual fall of Laos to communist forces in 1975, potentially leading to a more prolonged conflict. However, it may also have intensified anti-war sentiment in the U.S. and drawn more resources into a complex and contentious conflict.
The aims of the EU might have been changed since 1957?
It might have changed because the name changed
What factors might influence the outcome of a personality assessment?
Neuroticism, extroversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness would be five factors that might influence the outcome of a personality assessment.
How do you think the aims of the EU might have change since 1957?
It might have changed because the name changed
What characteristics might explorers need to be successful?
well you might
