It was marked by a major advancement in weapons without a similar achievement in mobility. The machine gun was a major factor in this. There was not much that could penetrate defenses held by machine guns at the time. They did have tanks, however these were slow, still rather unsophisticated, and unreliable as a major means of bombardment/troop movement. This led to trench warfare being put in use, due to the much higher efficiency of defense as compared to offense given then current technologies. Such a stationary war is at odds with much of what we've seen throughout military history, with maneuvering being just as large a part of strategy as weapons used, and to some extent numbers of troops used. Flanking. encircling, etc. was of little use when you had to do it across mine littered fields with machine guns mowing you down. This was almost purely a war of attrition.
that theres different contrys in each war
Because everyone had to make major changes to adjust to all the technological advances during the war
WW I was bigger than previous wars, because all the powerful nations of the world were involved on one side or the other, in two vast, opposed alliances (the Triple Entente vs. the Central Powers). No previous war had involved the whole world.
what is the difference bewteen the world war 2 and the modern day war and how are the weapons different between the two wars
The wars are not comparable. All had different causes, and were fought under different conditions. However, the Confederates liked to compare themselves with the heroes of the American Revolution, fighting for self-government. And the fighting at Petersburg in 1864-5 did resemble the trench warfare of World War 1.
that theres different contrys in each war
Yes, there is a possibility of another world war; however, there is also a push for countries to unite. If there is another world war, it will probably be much different than the previous wars.
Because everyone had to make major changes to adjust to all the technological advances during the war
The French 75, the machine gun and the aircraft.
50 to 70 million lives were lost during World War 2. No other war, not even World War 1, had even half that many deaths. You would have to combine the deaths of many different wars to even get close to the World War 2 death totals.
WW I was bigger than previous wars, because all the powerful nations of the world were involved on one side or the other, in two vast, opposed alliances (the Triple Entente vs. the Central Powers). No previous war had involved the whole world.
what is the difference bewteen the world war 2 and the modern day war and how are the weapons different between the two wars
Well they are different wars and different people fought in them.
there was only a world war 1 and world war 2
The wars are not comparable. All had different causes, and were fought under different conditions. However, the Confederates liked to compare themselves with the heroes of the American Revolution, fighting for self-government. And the fighting at Petersburg in 1864-5 did resemble the trench warfare of World War 1.
No, they were two different wars fought in different time periods.
it is because of how the wars started