answersLogoWhite

0

The thinking is if the race to gather destructive weapons was deterred then the arms race would be secondary and nations would stop.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Military History

Who were the historical personalities in the arms race and what were their roles?

Key historical personalities in the arms race include U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower and Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev. Eisenhower promoted policies such as the "New Look," emphasizing nuclear deterrence and the development of intercontinental ballistic missiles. Khrushchev, on the other hand, sought to expand the Soviet nuclear arsenal and showcase its capabilities, particularly during events like the Cuban Missile Crisis. Their interactions and military strategies significantly shaped the dynamics of the Cold War arms race.


What was The us policy of deterrence resulted in?

The U.S. policy of deterrence, primarily during the Cold War, aimed to prevent aggression by maintaining a credible threat of substantial retaliation against adversaries, particularly the Soviet Union. This strategy relied on nuclear capabilities and military readiness to dissuade hostile actions, fostering a tense but stable geopolitical environment. Ultimately, deterrence contributed to the avoidance of direct military conflict between superpowers, although it also led to an arms race and heightened global tensions.


Who was the president in during the arms race?

The president during the arms race was Harry S. Truman - EMS Student


How did the nuclear arms race affect the course of the cold war?

The nuclear arms race was the core of the cold war.


What was the significance of arms race?

The arms race, particularly during the Cold War, was significant as it intensified geopolitical tensions between superpowers, primarily the United States and the Soviet Union. It led to the development of advanced military technologies and nuclear arsenals, fostering an atmosphere of fear and mutual deterrence. This competition not only influenced international relations but also impacted domestic policies, economies, and the global balance of power, ultimately shaping the modern world and its security dynamics.

Related Questions

What has the author Adam Suddaby written?

Adam Suddaby has written: 'The nuclear arms race' 'The nuclear war game' -- subject(s): Military policy, Nuclear weapons, Nuclear warfare, Deterrence (Strategy), Arms race, History, United States, Great Britain


How did deterrence contribute to the arms race?

Deterrence contributed to the arms race by encouraging nations to build up their military capabilities to prevent adversaries from gaining an advantage. The fear of being outmatched led countries to stockpile weapons and develop advanced technologies, as they believed that possessing a formidable arsenal would discourage potential attacks. This cycle of escalation fostered an environment of mistrust and competition, with each side feeling compelled to enhance its military strength to maintain a balance of power. Consequently, deterrence became a driving force behind the continuous expansion of nuclear and conventional arsenals during the Cold War and beyond.


What does the arms race have to do with politics?

What! There is a race of arms!


What was the naval arms race about?

arms-race-naval-arms-racetalks about this here


Who were the historical personalities in the arms race and what were their roles?

Key historical personalities in the arms race include U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower and Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev. Eisenhower promoted policies such as the "New Look," emphasizing nuclear deterrence and the development of intercontinental ballistic missiles. Khrushchev, on the other hand, sought to expand the Soviet nuclear arsenal and showcase its capabilities, particularly during events like the Cuban Missile Crisis. Their interactions and military strategies significantly shaped the dynamics of the Cold War arms race.


What are the disadvantages of deterrence?

Deterrence can lead to an escalation of tensions, as states may engage in an arms race to outmatch each other, increasing the risk of conflict. It often relies on the assumption that adversaries will act rationally, which may not always be the case. Additionally, deterrence can foster a false sense of security, potentially leading to complacency in addressing underlying issues or conflicts. Lastly, it may not effectively deter non-state actors or rogue regimes, complicating international security dynamics.


What was The us policy of deterrence resulted in?

The U.S. policy of deterrence, primarily during the Cold War, aimed to prevent aggression by maintaining a credible threat of substantial retaliation against adversaries, particularly the Soviet Union. This strategy relied on nuclear capabilities and military readiness to dissuade hostile actions, fostering a tense but stable geopolitical environment. Ultimately, deterrence contributed to the avoidance of direct military conflict between superpowers, although it also led to an arms race and heightened global tensions.


How did the arms race lead to peace?

how did the arms race lead to the end of the fall of the soviet union


What ended the arms race?

The Arms Race ended with the end of the cold war and the breakup of the USSR. The nuclear arms race came about during the Cold War.


Why did the arms race start?

the arms race started because US wanted to get the most powerful bomb.


What was the Australian involvement in Pearl Harbor?

It got Them involved in arms race It got Them involved in arms race


What do you think is meant arms race?

'Arms race' was the 'race' between America and Soviet Russia to develop as many nuclear weapons as possible.