Diplomacy is generally considered more effective than war because it seeks to resolve conflicts through dialogue and negotiation, which can lead to sustainable and peaceful solutions. It fosters understanding, builds relationships, and can prevent the widespread destruction and loss of life associated with armed conflict. While war may achieve short-term goals, it often results in long-term consequences that can destabilize regions and create further grievances. Ultimately, diplomacy promotes stability and cooperation, making it a more constructive approach to international relations.
European leaders were relying more on their military strength than on diplomacy.
Guns would be more effective than other devises, right?
The obtaining of a political goal, by other than political means. as above: the ultimate failure of diplomacy.
Diplomacy didn't really 'solve' WWII - WWII happened because diplomacy failed.
cold war
War is obtaining a political goal by other than political means. Diplomacy failed in Korea. So it was settled by war.
European leaders were relying more on their military strength than on diplomacy.
European leaders were relying more on their military strength than on diplomacy.
European leaders were relying more on their military strength than on diplomacy.
intent to pursue the goals of foreign policy,through effective means of compromise,pursuation and threat of war.
Guns would be more effective than other devises, right?
she advanced Egypts economy and reputation, because unlike many Egytian pharos she worked on diplomacy and economy much more than conquring and war.
The dollar diplomacy was more straight forward, he didn't need to look for excuses to take actions whereas with the missionary diplomacy he had to wait for an excuse in which he used US sailors getting arrested tampico. Even though they were released soon after Wilson still took advantage of it and used it and more then 200 Mexicans died and 18 Americans. this had brought Mexico and the US close to war.
The obtaining of a political goal, by other than political means. as above: the ultimate failure of diplomacy.
Diplomacy didn't really 'solve' WWII - WWII happened because diplomacy failed.
Diplomacy played a crucial role in the war by facilitating negotiations, forming alliances, and attempting to resolve conflicts before they escalated into armed conflict. Diplomatic efforts aimed to create treaties and agreements that could prevent war or mitigate its impacts. However, failures in diplomacy often contributed to the outbreak of hostilities, as countries struggled to balance their interests and assert their power. Ultimately, effective diplomacy can be seen as a key factor in shaping the course and outcome of the war.
During World War II, the British Spitfire was generally considered more effective than the Japanese Zero. The Spitfire had better overall performance and was more versatile in combat situations.