0
Is mutually assured destruction based on the tit for tat game theory?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Yes. MAD is derived from the idea that when one side does something, the other side will attempt to do something at least as bad in return. Thus this escalating series of revenge will eventually destroy both sides.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why did the two superpowers never fire a shot?
Based on weapons stockpiles, there was mutually assured destruction if the two superpowers went to war
What was M.A.D?
Not sure of your context, but MAD during the cold war referred to Mutually Assured Destruction. It was a deterrence theory that was based on the assumption that neither side would launch an all out nuclear attack because they knew the other side would do the same, thus ensuring that neither side survived.
What was MAD mutually assured destruction?
Mutual assured destruction (MAD) is a doctrine of military strategy in which a full-scale use of nuclear weapons by two opposing sides would effectively result in the destruction of both the attacker and the defender.[1] It is based on the theory of deterrence according to which the deployment of strong weapons is essential to threaten the enemy in order to prevent the use of the very same weapons. The strategy is effectively a form of Nash equilibrium, in which both sides are attempting to avoid their worst possible outcome-nuclear annihilation. -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_assured_destruction
What was MAD during the cold war?
mad stands forMutual assured destructionNuclear weaponsHistoryWarfareArms raceDesignTestingEffectsDeliveryEspionageProliferationArsenalsTerrorismAnti-nuclear oppositionNuclear-armed statesUnited States · RussiaUnited Kingdom · FranceChina · India · IsraelPakistan · North KoreaSouth Africa (former)WarfareMilitary historyEras[show]Battlespace[show]Weapons[show]Tactics[show]Strategy[show]Organization[show]Logistics[show]Lists[show]PortalMutual assured destruction (MAD) is a doctrine of military strategy and national security policy in which a full-scale use ofnuclear weapons by two opposing sides would effectively result in the destruction of both the attacker and the defender,[1] becoming thus a war that has no victory nor any armistice but only total destruction. It is based on the theory of deterrence according to which the deployment of strong weapons is essential to threaten the enemy in order to prevent the use of the same weapons. The strategy is effectively a form of Nash equilibrium in which neither side, once armed, has any incentive to disarm.
President Eisenhower's domino theory was based on the idea of?
containment
Why did the two superpowers never fire a shot?
Based on weapons stockpiles, there was mutually assured destruction if the two superpowers went to war
What was M.A.D?
Not sure of your context, but MAD during the cold war referred to Mutually Assured Destruction. It was a deterrence theory that was based on the assumption that neither side would launch an all out nuclear attack because they knew the other side would do the same, thus ensuring that neither side survived.
What was MAD mutually assured destruction?
Mutual assured destruction (MAD) is a doctrine of military strategy in which a full-scale use of nuclear weapons by two opposing sides would effectively result in the destruction of both the attacker and the defender.[1] It is based on the theory of deterrence according to which the deployment of strong weapons is essential to threaten the enemy in order to prevent the use of the very same weapons. The strategy is effectively a form of Nash equilibrium, in which both sides are attempting to avoid their worst possible outcome-nuclear annihilation. -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_assured_destruction
What meant the US would punish the USSR with an all out nuclear attack if they launched a nuclear attack?
This meant that if the Soviets had attacked the US with nuclear-based weapons, the US would not be hesitant to retaliate and strike back with their own nuclear bombs. This idea is what characterises the Cold War, because if one power struck another power with similar capabilities (using such devastating weaponry), then it would mean mutually assured destruction for all participants.
What is a theory based on?
A theory is based on a hypothesis. A hypothesis is an estimated or intelligent guess about the outcome of an experiment. A theory is based on what happens during the experiment.
What are budget figures based on?
Budget figures may be based on actual, budgeted, or standard costs. These categories are not mutually exclusive.
What makes a theory a scientific theory opposed to a conspiracy theory?
One is based on scientific data the other is based on the unproven.
Is the evolutionary theory based on chance?
The theory of evolution by natural selection is not based on chance.
What is bad about atomic bombs?
If it kills you and your family and countrymen you would considered it evil or bad. The radiation from the blast is very deadly. Radioactive dust, or fallout, can travel to places where innocent people live. The dust can kill for a very long time--thousands of years.However, the pax nuclear (cold war as a standoff among superpower states) has kept the world from another world war since 1945. It is based upon MAD doctrine = Mutually Assured Destruction. If everyone dies, nobody wins, so let's not go there.
What is religious theory?
Religious theory refers to theoretical frameworks that seek to understand and explain aspects of religion, such as its origins, practices, beliefs, and influence on society. It often draws from disciplines like sociology, psychology, anthropology, and philosophy to analyze the role of religion in human life and society. Religious theory can encompass a wide range of perspectives and approaches, reflecting the diverse ways that scholars and thinkers have sought to make sense of religious phenomena.
Relevance of central based theory in regional planning?
relevance of central based theory in regional planning
Jurassic Park explain the theory of chaos?
Dr. Ian Malcom is a mathmetician in the book. He works with the chaos theory. Based on his work with the chaos theory, he decided from the very beginning that the island cannot work. He predicts that there are too many unkowns with the island for it to possibly work out. He is right. There are a lot of potential issues with island that eventually cause the island's destruction.
