answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

yes because it will bring out a big outcome or the out come will be a big sucess

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

SteveSteve
Knowledge is a journey, you know? We'll get there.
Chat with Steve
FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran
DevinDevin
I've poured enough drinks to know that people don't always want advice—they just want to talk.
Chat with Devin

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Material advantages are decisive in the outcome wars?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Military History

Why did Caesar blame the senate for the civil war?

The senate tried to take away all the advantages (and the glory) of Caesar's wars in Gaul. They also wanted to prosecute him for what they considered misdeeds or crimes when he was consul. Caesar considered this an insult to his "dignitas" or dignity, and the dignity of the soldiers who had fought with him. This concept of "dignitas" was an integral part of the Roman psyche.The senate tried to take away all the advantages (and the glory) of Caesar's wars in Gaul. They also wanted to prosecute him for what they considered misdeeds or crimes when he was consul. Caesar considered this an insult to his "dignitas" or dignity, and the dignity of the soldiers who had fought with him. This concept of "dignitas" was an integral part of the Roman psyche.The senate tried to take away all the advantages (and the glory) of Caesar's wars in Gaul. They also wanted to prosecute him for what they considered misdeeds or crimes when he was consul. Caesar considered this an insult to his "dignitas" or dignity, and the dignity of the soldiers who had fought with him. This concept of "dignitas" was an integral part of the Roman psyche.The senate tried to take away all the advantages (and the glory) of Caesar's wars in Gaul. They also wanted to prosecute him for what they considered misdeeds or crimes when he was consul. Caesar considered this an insult to his "dignitas" or dignity, and the dignity of the soldiers who had fought with him. This concept of "dignitas" was an integral part of the Roman psyche.The senate tried to take away all the advantages (and the glory) of Caesar's wars in Gaul. They also wanted to prosecute him for what they considered misdeeds or crimes when he was consul. Caesar considered this an insult to his "dignitas" or dignity, and the dignity of the soldiers who had fought with him. This concept of "dignitas" was an integral part of the Roman psyche.The senate tried to take away all the advantages (and the glory) of Caesar's wars in Gaul. They also wanted to prosecute him for what they considered misdeeds or crimes when he was consul. Caesar considered this an insult to his "dignitas" or dignity, and the dignity of the soldiers who had fought with him. This concept of "dignitas" was an integral part of the Roman psyche.The senate tried to take away all the advantages (and the glory) of Caesar's wars in Gaul. They also wanted to prosecute him for what they considered misdeeds or crimes when he was consul. Caesar considered this an insult to his "dignitas" or dignity, and the dignity of the soldiers who had fought with him. This concept of "dignitas" was an integral part of the Roman psyche.The senate tried to take away all the advantages (and the glory) of Caesar's wars in Gaul. They also wanted to prosecute him for what they considered misdeeds or crimes when he was consul. Caesar considered this an insult to his "dignitas" or dignity, and the dignity of the soldiers who had fought with him. This concept of "dignitas" was an integral part of the Roman psyche.The senate tried to take away all the advantages (and the glory) of Caesar's wars in Gaul. They also wanted to prosecute him for what they considered misdeeds or crimes when he was consul. Caesar considered this an insult to his "dignitas" or dignity, and the dignity of the soldiers who had fought with him. This concept of "dignitas" was an integral part of the Roman psyche.


Has Jordan been involved in any wars or civil wars recently?

No, it has not been in any wars yet. ;)


When did Sheep Wars happen?

Sheep Wars happened in 1870.


What wars were fought during Victorian times?

There were a number of Wars during the reign of Queen Victoria. The related link below will inform you about them.


Is wars a plural possessive or singular possessive?

The noun wars is the plural form of the singular noun war.The singular possessive form is war's.The plural possessive form is wars'.Examples:Our city was in ruins by the war's end. (singular)The wars' cost in lives in the twentieth century should never be repeated. (plural)

Related questions

Which of the wars brought the most decisive gains for Britain?

French and Indian War


What was a major outcome of Rome's victory in the Punic Wars?

Rome gained control of the Western Mediterranean.


Did Punic Wars had a disastrous effect on the Roman Republic?

No, they had a beneficial effect. During the wars the Romans learned how to adapt their military tactics and the outcome of the wars made Rome the dominant power in their part of the world.


What was Rome's outcome of the Punic Wars?

It gained domination of the Western Mediterranean and a foothold in the eastern Mediterranean in Macedonia.


What were the key factors that contributed to the outcome of the ancient Greece wars?

The key factors that contributed to the outcome of the ancient Greece wars were military strategy, leadership, alliances, and resources. These factors played a crucial role in determining the success or failure of the various city-states involved in the conflicts.


What were the weaknesses of the ancient Spartans?

Their limited population - as wars continued and battle casualties added up, they simply could not field a decisive army, and ceded superiority to Thebes.


What was the outcome of the Rome war?

Rome fought many wars over a thousand years. Which one do you want to talk about.


What sentence best describes the outcome of the Punic Wars?

It was a struggle for dominance of the Western Mediterranean between Rome and Carthage.


What was the most surprising about the outcome of the Persian wars?

The Persian Empire attacked Greece again 30 years later.


What was a major battle in the French and Indian War?

The decisive battle of French and Indian war was the battle of Quebec. It's Quebec 100% correct. The Battle of the Plains of Abraham, also known as the Battle of Quebec, was the most decisive battle of the French and Indian Wars.


Why was the outcome of Rome winning the punic wars?

The primary outcome of Rome winning the Punic wars was mastery of the western Mediterranean and its lucrative trade. Secondary positive outcomes for Rome was the addition of territory-- Spain, Sicily, and southern Italy; they were also able to expand eastward as they entered into a war with Phillip of Macedonia.


What was not surprising about the outcome of the Persian Wars?

The Greek dominance of the battlefields through their armoured infantry versus unarmoured Persian infantry.