yes because it will bring out a big outcome or the out come will be a big sucess
Chat with our AI personalities
The senate tried to take away all the advantages (and the glory) of Caesar's wars in Gaul. They also wanted to prosecute him for what they considered misdeeds or crimes when he was consul. Caesar considered this an insult to his "dignitas" or dignity, and the dignity of the soldiers who had fought with him. This concept of "dignitas" was an integral part of the Roman psyche.The senate tried to take away all the advantages (and the glory) of Caesar's wars in Gaul. They also wanted to prosecute him for what they considered misdeeds or crimes when he was consul. Caesar considered this an insult to his "dignitas" or dignity, and the dignity of the soldiers who had fought with him. This concept of "dignitas" was an integral part of the Roman psyche.The senate tried to take away all the advantages (and the glory) of Caesar's wars in Gaul. They also wanted to prosecute him for what they considered misdeeds or crimes when he was consul. Caesar considered this an insult to his "dignitas" or dignity, and the dignity of the soldiers who had fought with him. This concept of "dignitas" was an integral part of the Roman psyche.The senate tried to take away all the advantages (and the glory) of Caesar's wars in Gaul. They also wanted to prosecute him for what they considered misdeeds or crimes when he was consul. Caesar considered this an insult to his "dignitas" or dignity, and the dignity of the soldiers who had fought with him. This concept of "dignitas" was an integral part of the Roman psyche.The senate tried to take away all the advantages (and the glory) of Caesar's wars in Gaul. They also wanted to prosecute him for what they considered misdeeds or crimes when he was consul. Caesar considered this an insult to his "dignitas" or dignity, and the dignity of the soldiers who had fought with him. This concept of "dignitas" was an integral part of the Roman psyche.The senate tried to take away all the advantages (and the glory) of Caesar's wars in Gaul. They also wanted to prosecute him for what they considered misdeeds or crimes when he was consul. Caesar considered this an insult to his "dignitas" or dignity, and the dignity of the soldiers who had fought with him. This concept of "dignitas" was an integral part of the Roman psyche.The senate tried to take away all the advantages (and the glory) of Caesar's wars in Gaul. They also wanted to prosecute him for what they considered misdeeds or crimes when he was consul. Caesar considered this an insult to his "dignitas" or dignity, and the dignity of the soldiers who had fought with him. This concept of "dignitas" was an integral part of the Roman psyche.The senate tried to take away all the advantages (and the glory) of Caesar's wars in Gaul. They also wanted to prosecute him for what they considered misdeeds or crimes when he was consul. Caesar considered this an insult to his "dignitas" or dignity, and the dignity of the soldiers who had fought with him. This concept of "dignitas" was an integral part of the Roman psyche.The senate tried to take away all the advantages (and the glory) of Caesar's wars in Gaul. They also wanted to prosecute him for what they considered misdeeds or crimes when he was consul. Caesar considered this an insult to his "dignitas" or dignity, and the dignity of the soldiers who had fought with him. This concept of "dignitas" was an integral part of the Roman psyche.
No, it has not been in any wars yet. ;)
Sheep Wars happened in 1870.
There were a number of Wars during the reign of Queen Victoria. The related link below will inform you about them.
The noun wars is the plural form of the singular noun war.The singular possessive form is war's.The plural possessive form is wars'.Examples:Our city was in ruins by the war's end. (singular)The wars' cost in lives in the twentieth century should never be repeated. (plural)
French and Indian War
Rome gained control of the Western Mediterranean.
No, they had a beneficial effect. During the wars the Romans learned how to adapt their military tactics and the outcome of the wars made Rome the dominant power in their part of the world.
It gained domination of the Western Mediterranean and a foothold in the eastern Mediterranean in Macedonia.
The key factors that contributed to the outcome of the ancient Greece wars were military strategy, leadership, alliances, and resources. These factors played a crucial role in determining the success or failure of the various city-states involved in the conflicts.
Their limited population - as wars continued and battle casualties added up, they simply could not field a decisive army, and ceded superiority to Thebes.
Rome fought many wars over a thousand years. Which one do you want to talk about.
It was a struggle for dominance of the Western Mediterranean between Rome and Carthage.
The Persian Empire attacked Greece again 30 years later.
The decisive battle of French and Indian war was the battle of Quebec. It's Quebec 100% correct. The Battle of the Plains of Abraham, also known as the Battle of Quebec, was the most decisive battle of the French and Indian Wars.
The primary outcome of Rome winning the Punic wars was mastery of the western Mediterranean and its lucrative trade. Secondary positive outcomes for Rome was the addition of territory-- Spain, Sicily, and southern Italy; they were also able to expand eastward as they entered into a war with Phillip of Macedonia.
The Greek dominance of the battlefields through their armoured infantry versus unarmoured Persian infantry.