The easiest anwser is that the North had technology, shear number of troops, and industry on their side. The South had much better generals, a more willingness to fight, and that the war was fought in their back yard
The north had more advantages, the south had more allies.
The South's strategy during the Civil War was to get Great Britian's support. >The South's strategy was to use the great military leaders and commanders they had in order to defeat the North. With the North having multiple advantages, the South used their strongest factor: military training.
The North had the most factories, farmland, and railroad tracks. There were also more people in the North and the they had a navy.
True. At the start of the Civil War, the North had a greater number of trained military leaders, largely because many of the nation's military academies, including West Point, were located in the North. While the South had skilled leaders, many of whom were experienced from previous conflicts, the North benefitted from a higher concentration of military training and resources. This disparity contributed to the North's initial advantages in military organization and leadership.
During the Civil War, the north needed to keep the Union together, to free the slaves, and to restructure the south. The North also wanted the Union to keep an united front on international affairs.
The north had more advantages, the south had more allies.
Most advantages, economic and otherwise, favored the North
They served as volunteer nurses in military hospitals during the civil war.
yes union to the north and confederate to the south
In the North - men of military age who could pay a substitute to take their place.
Although the north had better advantages the South had better leaders such as Confederate President Jefferson Davis and General Robert E. Lee. Abraham Lincoln had no military training while Jefferson Davis had plenty training.
They had slaves fighting for them, and they knew the area very well, and also they had the most people. The south had the most up to date equipment and the best military leaders. The north did NOT have good leaders such as McClellan.
During the Civil War, the North had advantages such as a larger population, greater industrial capacity, and a more extensive railway network, which facilitated troop movement and supply distribution. In contrast, the South had the advantage of fighting a defensive war on familiar territory and possessed strong military leadership, with many experienced officers. However, the South faced significant disadvantages, including limited resources and infrastructure, while the North struggled with initial military leadership and the challenge of waging war far from home. Overall, these factors shaped the strategies and outcomes of the conflict.
The Help in many sexual ways.
The South's strategy during the Civil War was to get Great Britian's support. >The South's strategy was to use the great military leaders and commanders they had in order to defeat the North. With the North having multiple advantages, the South used their strongest factor: military training.
The North's advantage in its large population allowed for the recruitment of more soldiers. In terms of personal property, this was not a factor during the US Civil War.
The North had the most factories, farmland, and railroad tracks. There were also more people in the North and the they had a navy.