Neutrality
There are many elements of war. They include conflict, weapons, fighting, and a lot of killing on both sides.
It was not uncommon for rogue commanders to have prisoners executed. This was true for both sides of the conflict.
Spain and Portugal were both neutral during World War 2 and didn't take sides.
THE FAT AS$ TOASTER ATE THE KAREN
A country that does not want to take sides in a mainland European way would have to have reason to not take sides. Remaining neutral is incredibly difficult if interests are going to be affected by a way.
Not taking sides in a war is called neutrality
No. But it can lead to it. War is conflict. It often creates more entrenchment on both sides of a conflict.
neutral
Both sides of the conflict.
civil war
The two opposing sides in a conflict or war can vary depending on the context. For example, during the American Civil War, the opposing sides were the Union and the Confederacy. In World War II, they were the Allies and the Axis powers. Each conflict has its own specific names for the factions involved.
Zeus
There are many elements of war. They include conflict, weapons, fighting, and a lot of killing on both sides.
The Civil War
If you mean not taking sides in a war its neutral
Stalemate. Both sides ended the conflict in much the same place they started. Technically, the war hasn't ended, as the two sides have only agreed a ceasefire - not peace.
American Civil War