World War II was called the War of Attrition because by its definition it required that it was fought defensively meaning not fought on American soil. This means that there was little damage to the US.
The Japanese fought a war of attrition .
WWI was fought to gain ground, thus the trenches; designed to hold taken ground. The high losses of troops caused attrition. Vietnam was NOT fought to gain ground, and is thusly termed a war of attrition.
Grant didn't like the war. Although fearless and unflappable in peril, he deeply suffered for the misery and pain and the spectacle of bloodshed that the war was causing upset him profoundly.
In the Civil War, Ulysses S. Grant fought for the Union.
World War II was called the War of Attrition because by its definition it required that it was fought defensively meaning not fought on American soil. This means that there was little damage to the US.
The Japanese fought a war of attrition .
War of attrition
WWI was fought to gain ground, thus the trenches; designed to hold taken ground. The high losses of troops caused attrition. Vietnam was NOT fought to gain ground, and is thusly termed a war of attrition.
Grant didn't like the war. Although fearless and unflappable in peril, he deeply suffered for the misery and pain and the spectacle of bloodshed that the war was causing upset him profoundly.
so many people fought and because the generals used attrition instead of tactics
Because he conducted a war of attrition, knowing that there would be huge casualties on both sides.
The South fought a War of Attrition to make the Northern population sick of war, and make Lincoln negotiate peace.
In the Civil War, Ulysses S. Grant fought for the Union.
they fought in the civil war to serve their country.
He planned a war of attrition-that is, to continue fighting until the south ran out of men supplies, and the will to fight
General Grant fought in the American civil war not WW2