Prior to World War II, the diplomatic policy of appeasement was in fact an effective way to avoid general war. For much of the 1930s, appeasement succeeded in holding off any conflict comparable to World War I. Whether this policy was wise is another question, for some have argued that a harder stance towards Germany in the 1930s could have led to a much quicker, less expansive war.
Not really. The Appeasement policy only prolonged the inevitable.
giving in to others to prevent conflict
Appeasement.
chamberlain did no war so he made an act for appeasement also since the great depression was still in act no one in europe or outside europe was prepared for another war
appeasement
Policy of appeasement.
giving in to others to prevent conflict
The policy of appeasement refers to Hitler saying at the Munich conference that he would not invade any more of Europe after Czechoslovakia. It failed, obviously.
Appeasement.
by separating them
The policy of appeasement was Lloyd George's response to not declaring war on Germany.
AppeasementThe policy of appeasement.
chamberlain did no war so he made an act for appeasement also since the great depression was still in act no one in europe or outside europe was prepared for another war
why did France and britiain choose the policy of appeasement
Appeasement is the policy of giving in to the demands of an aggressor to keep the peace.
Appeasement never works. See answer to this question.What_is_wrong_with_the_policy_of_appeasement
The policy of appeasement.
Prime Minester of England Chamberlin