answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The term you are referring to is "Total War" in which a country devotes all resources/citizens to the war effort. There have only been a few instances in which an entire country has devoted all of their resources to war. An example would be Germany in WWII. They as a country put all efforts towards the war, though in the end, lost. Countries like U.S.A. and the U.S.S.R. put forth alot of their resources towards the war but not nearly all.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Refered to as "Total War"

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What countries devote all their resources to winning the war?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Where participating countries devote all their resources to the war effort?

Total War


What is devote to distract nouns?

(DEVOTE SOMETHING TO) give all or a large part of one's time or resources to (a person, activity, or cause):


What are some renewable and nonrenewable resources in Italy?

Renewable and nonrenewable resources are basically the same all countries.


What do the countries that border the Persian Gulf have in common?

They all have oil resources


Why can't each country have all of its own resources?

Large countries usually have more resources than small countries. Some countries are sunny and can use solar power. Others are windy so they can put up wind turbines. Other countries have very few resources so they rely on neighbouring countries.


Why do countries need to trade?

Countries need to trade because they do not have all of the resources they need to survive. Countries also gain by trading what they have in surplus.


How do you use the word swine in a sentence?

The farmer raised a herd of swine for commercial purposes.


What happened to Africa when it was under imperial rule?

All of its resources were taken by European countries.


What may happen to a country that only has few natural resources?

There are a few problems and solutions to this situation. Firstly, if a country has few Natural Resources, it may have a bad economy. However, it can rely on trades, especially if it is a port city like Hong Kong or Singapore. Since there are a few natural resources, human resources can solve the problem as well, through education of the people to boost international cargo trade etc. However, these countries will have to depend on other countries for natural resources for projects. If these countries do not maintain good international relationships with many other countries, the country may fail as a whole since there are no resources at all to do anything. These countries may also be threatened by other countries who wish to exploit. Other big countries may increase the prices of their exports of resources to these countries, making them fall into a 'take it or leave it' situation.


Why have countries agreed to not use resources in Antarctica?

Countries representing 80% of the earth's population haveagreed to use the data resources in Antarctica -- in all land south of 60 degrees S -- for the scientific study of the health of the planet.


List of African countries and their colonial masters?

France ruled its countries because they took all there supplies and natural resources.


What is the winning ratio of Host Countries in all the World Cup Tournaments?

It will suprise many that 7 winners of the world cup were the hosts.