The term you are referring to is "Total War" in which a country devotes all resources/citizens to the war effort. There have only been a few instances in which an entire country has devoted all of their resources to war. An example would be Germany in WWII. They as a country put all efforts towards the war, though in the end, lost. Countries like U.S.A. and the U.S.S.R. put forth alot of their resources towards the war but not nearly all.
Total War
World War or Total War .
Once participating countries in World War I began devoting all resources to the war effort, the conflict evolved into a total war. This meant that not only military forces but entire nations' economies, industries, and civilian populations were mobilized to support the war. Governments enacted measures such as conscription, rationing, and propaganda to sustain their efforts, leading to significant societal changes and increased state control over various aspects of life. The scale and intensity of the war ultimately transformed it into a struggle that affected every facet of participating countries.
Probably all of European countries.
All the west countries and Part of East and Russia
Total War
(DEVOTE SOMETHING TO) give all or a large part of one's time or resources to (a person, activity, or cause):
Renewable and nonrenewable resources are basically the same all countries.
Countries depend on each other for natural resources because not every country has access to all the resources it needs. Some countries have abundant reserves of certain resources, while others have shortages. By trading with each other, countries can obtain the resources they lack, promoting economic growth and stability.
They all have oil resources
Large countries usually have more resources than small countries. Some countries are sunny and can use solar power. Others are windy so they can put up wind turbines. Other countries have very few resources so they rely on neighbouring countries.
Countries need to trade because they do not have all of the resources they need to survive. Countries also gain by trading what they have in surplus.
I have the swine flu. The farmer decided to stop raising cattle and devote all her resources to raising swine.
All of its resources were taken by European countries.
It will suprise many that 7 winners of the world cup were the hosts.
There are a few problems and solutions to this situation. Firstly, if a country has few Natural Resources, it may have a bad economy. However, it can rely on trades, especially if it is a port city like Hong Kong or Singapore. Since there are a few natural resources, human resources can solve the problem as well, through education of the people to boost international cargo trade etc. However, these countries will have to depend on other countries for natural resources for projects. If these countries do not maintain good international relationships with many other countries, the country may fail as a whole since there are no resources at all to do anything. These countries may also be threatened by other countries who wish to exploit. Other big countries may increase the prices of their exports of resources to these countries, making them fall into a 'take it or leave it' situation.
Countries representing 80% of the earth's population haveagreed to use the data resources in Antarctica -- in all land south of 60 degrees S -- for the scientific study of the health of the planet.