Not sure but I do know the PLA still uses them.
party cannons are
no
Flamethrowers were primarily designed for military use, aiming to clear enemy trenches, bunkers, and fortifications by projecting a stream of fire. They were also employed to create psychological terror, demoralizing enemy troops and forcing them to abandon their positions. Additionally, flamethrowers could be used in other contexts, such as clearing vegetation or controlling wildfires. Overall, their primary goal was to enhance combat effectiveness through destruction and intimidation.
Flamethrowers have several disadvantages, including limited range due to the short reach of the ignited fuel, the potential for backfire or explosion if not used properly, and the risk of causing unintended collateral damage or starting uncontrollable fires. Additionally, flamethrowers are often heavy and cumbersome to carry, making them impractical for extended use in combat situations. Furthermore, the intense heat and flames produced by flamethrowers can also pose a significant risk to the operator if not handled with extreme caution.
Flamethrowers were primarily used during World War I and II as infantry weapons to clear trenches, bunkers, and enemy fortifications by projecting a stream of burning fuel. They created psychological terror and effectively cleared areas of troops and equipment. In addition to military applications, flamethrowers have also been used in controlled burns for land management and agriculture. Despite their effectiveness, their use has raised ethical and humanitarian concerns due to the severe burns they can inflict.
Flamethrowers are not commonly used in modern warfare due to the humanitarian concerns and the Geneva Convention prohibiting their use against personnel. However, certain countries and law enforcement agencies may still possess and use flamethrowers for specific purposes such as clearing vegetation or controlled burns.
Yes, flamethrowers are still used today, primarily by military forces for combat purposes and by certain firefighting units for controlled burns and clearing vegetation. They are also utilized in specific industrial applications, such as in agriculture for pest control and in demolition. However, their use is controversial due to ethical concerns regarding their effectiveness and the potential for causing severe harm.
Yes it is. Few countries still use the MG42 Machine gun. These countries includes; Germany, Italy and Pakistan.
I do believe that they are not not illegal.
None of the European countries use capital punishment.To view lists of the countries by death penalty status, see Related Questions, below.
Meters are used as a base measurement of length in almost all countries (excluding America).
Yes, shadufs are still in use today.
The Vietnam War may have been the last time US tanks used flame-throwers on their tanks. Today's hi-tech computorized weapons have largely negated the reasons for such primitive weapons. Those flame throwers certainly look effective and devastating on television, and like ANY weapon they are deadly...but they are not nearly as destructive in real life. Especially when operating in DAMP environments; such as in a rain forest (read JUNGLE) or the snow. There's also been some "environmental protective" attention brought about by people (nations) since Vietnam...such as "un-humanitarian weapons" such as Napalm bombs, etc. Certain people don't like certain weapons used in war...and flame weapons are in that "certain category." The Answer Above is not ACTUALLY RIGHT Flamethrower Tanks are still used. Flamethrowers are actually not i mean They still use them in training and for demonstrations and even some countries use them for Wars that are currently active. Flame Tanks are a great use and would be needed in Afghanistan to clear out Tunnels dug in by the Enemy.
The 2 locks that are still in use today is the Poe and the MacArthur locks.!!
Are ploughs and fallow land still use today
The concept of the number zero first appeared in India around 458 A.D.
no