It meant the force they were with
what are you on about world war come on dont be a gick and chillaxethe answer is x-mas
It would mean the year that the dog tag wearer got a tetanus shot, in this case 1941-1942.
actually soldiers used dog tags as early as 1861 to identify their bodies in war if they died in combat.
Name, rank, serial number
so that the body could be identified.....
United States: GI Dog Tags were not created until after World War One. The British soldiers did have ID Tags in WW1. In the Second World War US ID Tags had: Name; Grade/Rank; Service #.
what are you on about world war come on dont be a gick and chillaxethe answer is x-mas
It would mean the year that the dog tag wearer got a tetanus shot, in this case 1941-1942.
RFID tags, or Radio Frequency Identification tags, have been developed during the second world war, and they became more present in society throughout time. By now, RFID tags have even replaced barcode tags!
actually soldiers used dog tags as early as 1861 to identify their bodies in war if they died in combat.
Name, rank, serial number
so that the body could be identified.....
See the link to the right for information on a World War Two dog tag through four phases of change.
dog tags contain: name serial number blood type religious preference
World War 1 dog tags usually vary in price depending on which country they originate from. For example a German dog tag is worth more because after the war the Germans melted all of the dog tags down making it more rare. But in the current market a conservative price would be around 100 to 130 dollars.
china was in world war 1 because it was a WORLD WAR that would mean it was a war of our world.........
The Great War is another name for World War 1, as far as I know The Great War was not even close to the death figure as World War 2.Death figure according to Wikipedia:16.5 million deaths in World War 1113 million deaths in World War 2These numbers include civilian and military deaths, it doesn't include the wounded. The numbers don't come close to matching up. According to these numbers I am pretty sure World War 2 was the bloodiest war, not World War 1.I hope this is somewhat useful information.