In the context not only of the American Civil War but of many other wars, as well, the phrase "rich man's war and poor man's fight" is a significant one. Its basic meaning is that, while wealthy leaders may cause wars, it is the poor people who end up doing the actual fighting -- and dying.
An act for "enrolling and calling out the National Forces"
People in the South referred to the Civil War as "The rich mans' war and the poor mans' fight" because the North [the rich men] due to the industrial revolution had more money and you tactics and weapons one might use in a major war. While the South [the poor men] were still economically based through agriculture and did not have the extra money the North had because they stayed that way and did not industrialised the South had to use more common weapons and different tactics to match up with the weapons they had to use.
The phrase "a rich man's war but a poor man's fight" emerged during the draft as it highlighted the disparity in how socioeconomic status influenced participation in the conflict. Wealthy individuals could often evade military service through various means, such as paying for substitutes or securing deferments, while the less affluent had no such options and were compelled to enlist. This created a perception that the burdens of war disproportionately fell on the poor, fueling resentment and protests against the draft and the war itself.
Sam Watkins was correct in saying that the Civil War was a rich man's war and a poor man's fight. There were more poor farmers fighting than rich plantation owners.
John Stamos
It meant poor white trash fighting for the continued wealth of slave-owners
Rich men could pay a man to take their place in the draft. Therefore poor men fought in a rich man's place.
An act for "enrolling and calling out the National Forces"
Tata nano
because rich people pay poor people to fight in the war because they don't want to fight in the war
People in the South referred to the Civil War as "The rich mans' war and the poor mans' fight" because the North [the rich men] due to the industrial revolution had more money and you tactics and weapons one might use in a major war. While the South [the poor men] were still economically based through agriculture and did not have the extra money the North had because they stayed that way and did not industrialised the South had to use more common weapons and different tactics to match up with the weapons they had to use.
Because the Confederacy had a law that anyone owning a certain number of slaves could be sent home; therefore the men/boys who weren't rich enough to live on plantations and such had to fight in part to preserve the way of life favored by those better off. The Southern foot soldiers referred to it as "rich man's war, poor man's fight".
because he thinks its good to fight and steal from the rich and give to the poor
They said it was a rich man's war and a poor man's fight. That was because a lot of dirt-poor troops were having to fight for the profits of rich landowners who were not in uniform. Northern troops were saying the same - because of the disastrous law that allowed rich young men to pay a substitute to enlist in their place.
Sam Watkins was correct in saying that the Civil War was a rich man's war and a poor man's fight. There were more poor farmers fighting than rich plantation owners.
rich soil and mild climate made good conditions for farming
rich soil and mild climate made good conditions for farming