answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Military History

This Union general's overly cautious approch led the little progress in the East and impatience on the part of Lincoln?

McClellan


What union general could be described as overly cautious?

Most of them, depending on your perspective. The one generally considered overly cautious is General McClellan, who led the entire Union Army in late 1861 and early 1862. Even with extreme superior numbers in men, cannon, and supplies he did not attack South for months. When he finally did, he moved south around Richmond and landed on the James peninsula, then slowed his assault as he believed his force was outnumbered 2 to 1. He was eventually relieved of command after the debacle of the Seven Days Campaign and his terrible inactivity.


What side was George McClellan on north or South?

George McClellan was on the Union side during the American Civil War. He served as a general in the Union Army and was appointed as the commander of the Army of the Potomac. Although he had notable successes, his leadership was also criticized for being overly cautious. He played a significant role in the early years of the war before being relieved of command in 1862.


Who was the commander of the union troops before grant?

George McClellan was the general before Grant. After the battle of Richmond, Lincoln accused him of having the slows due to the fact that he was overly conservative and cautious. He did not pursue the southern retreat after the battle, a move which was considered by many a prolonging of the war. His decisions caused him to loose his position as general to Grant, a drunkard who was willing to take "necessary risks".


Why was the union general mcclellan not effective as military commander?

His despatches to Lincoln reveal that he was all talk, no action - he promised too much. Also he was too inclined to believe exaggerated estimates of enemy numbers, and this made him even more cautious.

Related Questions

This Union general's overly cautious approch led the little progress in the East and impatience on the part of Lincoln?

McClellan


What union general could be described as overly cautious?

Most of them, depending on your perspective. The one generally considered overly cautious is General McClellan, who led the entire Union Army in late 1861 and early 1862. Even with extreme superior numbers in men, cannon, and supplies he did not attack South for months. When he finally did, he moved south around Richmond and landed on the James peninsula, then slowed his assault as he believed his force was outnumbered 2 to 1. He was eventually relieved of command after the debacle of the Seven Days Campaign and his terrible inactivity.


What Union general was overly cautious approach that led to little progress in the East?

Union general Geoge Mcellen, after the battle of antietam, he failed to pursue Lees army, allowing them to escape. He was fired for this


What best describes General George B McClellan's personality?

He was a strict and organized man. Although sometimes, he was overly cautious, and mistakes led him to get frustrated very quickly.


What is a synonym for paranoid?

A synonym for paranoid is extra suspicious or overly cautious.


Can you re-pierce your navel after having your gallbladder removed?

Well a professional body piercer would need to look to see what you have to work with, but in general there should be no overly reason why it can't be done.


Is mad-eye in Harry Potter a good person?

Yes he definitely is...he is a bit too tough, overly-cautious and paranoid but good at heart.


How did McClellan's caution lead to the second Battle of Bull Run?

General George McClellan's caution and hesitance to aggressively pursue Confederate forces after the Battle of Antietam allowed General Robert E. Lee to regroup and strengthen his army. McClellan's delays in mobilizing and making decisive attacks provided Lee the opportunity to launch an offensive into Northern Virginia. This culminated in the Second Battle of Bull Run in August 1862, where Lee's forces defeated the Union troops, showcasing the consequences of McClellan's overly cautious approach to command.


Why did Pres. Lincoln replace General George McClellan with General Sherman?

Lincoln did replace General McClellan. However, he called upon General Ambrose Burnside rather than General Sherman. President Lincoln had almost nothing but trouble out of McClellan who had enjoyed one of the first Union successes of the war in a minor local affair on the Ohio River, and so was brought east to take command of the Army of the Potomac following the disaster of the First Battle of Bull Run. McClellan was good at one thing: training soldiers, but in other military functions, he was incompetent, insolent, and overly cautious: to the point of insubordination. Some, and especially Lincoln, felt that his slow pace was deliberate and designed to needle the president. Further, he had demonstrated his disrespect for the president in several incidents so, after the mid-term elections, Lincoln relieved him of command.


Who was the commander of the union troops before grant?

George McClellan was the general before Grant. After the battle of Richmond, Lincoln accused him of having the slows due to the fact that he was overly conservative and cautious. He did not pursue the southern retreat after the battle, a move which was considered by many a prolonging of the war. His decisions caused him to loose his position as general to Grant, a drunkard who was willing to take "necessary risks".


What was Omar bradley's opinion of gen Montgomery?

General Omar Bradley had a mixed opinion of General Montgomery. He admired Montgomery's military skill and leadership during World War II, particularly in the North African and Italian campaigns. However, Bradley also criticized Montgomery for being overly cautious and slow in advancing, which sometimes hindered the overall progress of Allied operations.


Why was the union general mcclellan not effective as military commander?

His despatches to Lincoln reveal that he was all talk, no action - he promised too much. Also he was too inclined to believe exaggerated estimates of enemy numbers, and this made him even more cautious.