The Dred Scott decision by the Supreme Court came first (1857).
It was one of the causes of the Civil War, as it heightened the tensions between the two sections.
The secession of the first Southern state, South Carolina, (December 1860) was a more immediate trigger. Six states followed, and then Confederate gunners fired on a U.S. Army garrison in Charleston Harbour - the first shots of the war.
*farts*
The Dred Scott decision and a philosophy of judicial restraint
The Dred Scott decision electrified the the nation. chief justice Roger B. tanry said the Dred Scott was still a slave.
The Dred Scott decision or Dred Scott v. Sandford, took place in 1857. His case was based on the fact that he and his wife Harriet Scott were slaves, but had lived in states and territories where slavery was illegal, including Illinois and Minnesota (which was then part of the Wisconsin Territory). Dred Scott lost the case when The United States Supreme Court ruled seven to two, on the grounds that he, nor any person of African ancestry, could claim citizenship in the United States, and that therefore Scott could not bring suit in federal court under diversity of citizenship rules.
The Dred Scott verdict - which appeared to mean that slavery was legal anywhere in the USA. The Lincoln-Douglas debates - won by Douglas, who said that each state should decide whether to be free or slave. The John Brown raid - which made the Abolitionists look like terrorists, and gave respectability to Southern slave-owners.
s
Franklin Buchanan was the 15th President of the US. he enforced the Dred-Scott Decision. he was President in 1857-1861. An event that happened while he was President was that 7 southern states had seceded, or left the union.
They were delighted. It appeared to mean that every state in the Union was open for slavery.
Southern slave owners were happy with the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision because it allowed them to take their slaves into slave free territories and not give up ownership. The case undermined local sovereignty.
Southern states governments were pleased by the Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision because it reinforced the rights of slave owners and declared African Americans as non-citizens. This decision protected the institution of slavery and helped maintain the social and economic order in the South.
They believed that since slaves were their property that they could have property wherever they pleased :]
Scott didn't win his freedom and the decision reinforced the idea that slaves were property. The Missouri Compromise was a blow to the southern states to gain more slave states. I don't think the Scott decision added anything to the compromise, but it did entrench slavery in the states where it existed.
The Dred Scott decision by the US Supreme Court in 1857 confirmed what large scale slave owners in the south always believed. That was that slavery was legal under the US Constitution. The Court's decision was controversial, however, only a constitutional amendment could change that decision.
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
...slavery was protected by the constitution on the grounds that a man's property was sacred and slaves were property.
Southerners benefited the most from the Dred Scott Decision.
not- Roger Taney handed down the Dred Scott v. Sandford decision.