Active writing has the form subject +verb+object.
eg The colonel shot the deserter
We are told who did the action (shoot).
The opposite to this is passive writing which has the form object + verb.
eg The deserter was shot.
We don't know who did the action shoot.
This applies to army writing or any kind of writing, active writing would always tell you who did the action of the verb
The army typically prefers the active voice in military writing, as it promotes clarity and directness, making communication more effective. Active voice emphasizes accountability and decisiveness, which are crucial in military contexts. However, passive voice may be used selectively for formal reports or when the doer is less important than the action itself. Overall, the emphasis is on clear, concise communication to ensure understanding and swift action.
True passive voice can actually obscure clarity and directness in Army writing. While it emphasizes the action over the subject, it often leads to ambiguity and can make sentences longer and more complex. Clear communication in Army writing typically favors active voice, which identifies the subject performing the action, ensuring that messages are straightforward and easily understood. For effective communication, active voice is generally preferred to maintain clarity and directness.
Active Ready Reserve, or Army Ready Reserve. The remainder of an 8 hour commitment, after leaving active duty.
Yes. As an active reserve member you are still under the same contract as active duty. Your most recent discharge is used for benifit information.
Maybe, passive is used when it is not important to know who the 'doer' of the action is. eg The Mona Lisa was painted in 1504. Passive is often used to write about processes eg Tea is grown in Sri Lanka. It is picked and dried. Then it is packed in boxes. So it depends on what you are writing about.
The two essential requirements for good army writing are putting the main point at the beginning and using active voice.
The two essential requirements for good army writing are putting the main point at the beginning and using active voice.
No. Whenever possible, use active voice.
The two essential requirements for good army writing are putting the main point at the beginning and using active voice.
The two essential requirements for good army writing are putting the main point at the beginning and using active voice.
The two essential requirements for good army writing are putting the main point at the beginning and using active voice.
The two essential requirements for good army writing are putting the main point at the beginning and using active voice.
Using the active voice rather than passive voice
Not sure about the "army" part of your question, but the easiest way to write in the active voice is to "blame" your subject for the action. So, instead of "the cup was broken by Bob" (passive voice), write, "Bob broke the cup."
Putting the main point at the beginning.
The army typically prefers the active voice in military writing, as it promotes clarity and directness, making communication more effective. Active voice emphasizes accountability and decisiveness, which are crucial in military contexts. However, passive voice may be used selectively for formal reports or when the doer is less important than the action itself. Overall, the emphasis is on clear, concise communication to ensure understanding and swift action.
An active voice