They called the women in the Armed Forces by their rank. Any women not serving in the war were called civilians.
They freed men up to do combat tasks.
they where nurse's...
Yes, women can and do fight in various capacities within military forces around the world. Many countries have integrated women into combat roles, recognizing their capabilities and contributions. Additionally, women have historically participated in armed conflicts, serving as soldiers, medics, and in other essential roles. The acceptance and roles of women in fighting forces continue to evolve, reflecting broader societal changes regarding gender equality.
At the end of World War II, there were over 23 million men and women in uniform. It was imperative that that number be reduced because it was unsustainable. So, the forces were reduced and munitions were decommission at several places across the country.
They called the women in the Armed Forces by their rank. Any women not serving in the war were called civilians.
They freed men up to do combat tasks.
Should young men and women be required to serve in the armed forces? Why, Yes.
it an opportunity for a nation to show support for the men and women who make up the armed forces
None- They are all in the kitchen...
they where nurse's...
She advocated women in the armed forces.
Yes, women serve on active duty in the military. In the United States, women have been serving in the armed forces for decades, and there are no gender restrictions on active duty service. Women contribute in various roles and occupations, including combat positions.
If you are asking what did women in the armed forces do,rather than combat,they were clerical help and nurses.
Lucy Noakes has written: 'Women And The Armed Forces'
Women did the jobs that were usually done by the men who were by now in the Armed Forces. They worked in factories, drove buses and worked on farms. They were also employed in the Armed Forces but not in combative roles.
Many, many brave men and women !!