answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What was the opportunity cost of the US decision to remain neutral at the beginning of World War 2?

so you won't have a lot of people attacking you


What was the opportunity cost of the US decision to remain neutral at the beginning of the world war 2?

so you won't have a lot of people attacking you


What was the cost of the us decision to remain neutral at the beginning of World War 2?

so you won't have a lot of people attacking you


What reasons did the US remain neutral for the beginning of the World War 2?

The US wasn't attacked (yet).


Why did Athenians reject Melina's offer to remain neutral?

Athenians rejected Melina's offer to remain neutral because they viewed the conflict as an opportunity to assert their power and influence in the region. They believed that allowing Melina to remain neutral would undermine their strategic objectives and embolden other states to challenge Athenian authority. Furthermore, the Athenians were committed to their imperial ambitions and saw the subjugation of Melina as essential to maintaining their dominance in the Aegean. This decision reflected their broader strategy of expansion and control over surrounding territories.


At the outbreak of world war 1 Woodrow Wilson urged for Americans to?

Remain out of war.


How does the concept of increasing opportunity cost compare to constant opportunity cost in decision-making processes?

In decision-making, increasing opportunity cost means that as you choose more of one option, the benefits of choosing that option decrease compared to other options. Constant opportunity cost means the benefits of choosing one option remain the same regardless of how much of that option you choose. So, with increasing opportunity cost, the more you choose one option, the more you give up in terms of other options, while with constant opportunity cost, the trade-offs remain consistent.


Is ice acid base or neutral?

It is neutral. Water is neutral so it will remain neutral in all its forms.


What were some arguments that supported the decision of the us to remain neutral?

The war was a European war. The expense to build armaments was massive. Americans did not want to bury other Americans.


What is the difference between constant opportunity cost and increasing opportunity cost, and how does this impact decision-making in resource allocation?

Constant opportunity cost refers to a situation where the cost of producing one more unit of a good remains the same. Increasing opportunity cost occurs when the cost of producing one more unit of a good increases as more units are produced. In decision-making for resource allocation, constant opportunity cost allows for easier decision-making as the trade-offs remain consistent. On the other hand, increasing opportunity cost makes decision-making more complex as the trade-offs become more significant with each additional unit produced. This can lead to more careful consideration and evaluation of resource allocation decisions.


How did the postwar policies of the US and Soviet Union contribute to the beginning of the Cold War?

The USSR & US "Were" the Cold War. The earth was a divided house. One side of the globe was communist; the other side was non-communist. Those that were neutral were constantly striving to remain neutral.


Will a semiconductor remain electrically neutral after doping?

Yes