0
What else can I help you with?
What was nuclear deterrence or mutual destruction?
nuclear deterrence - the idea that if you attack me with nuclear weapons then I will attack you back with nuclear weaponsmutual assured destruction - the idea that if you attack me with nuclear weapons then I will totally destroy you with nuclear weapons and if I attack you with nuclear weapons then you will totally destroy me with nuclear weapons - thus any nuclear attack by either party will result in the certain destruction of both parties
What is mutual assured destruction?
The level of nuclear weapons required to completely destroy both sides in any war making use of such weapons.
How do weapons of mass destruction prevent war?
Nuclear weapons serve as a deterrent. One country will be less likely to attack another that it knows has nuclear capability because of the destruction that could be wrought by nuclear weapons. This theory is called MAD or Mutually Assured Destruction, meaning that both sides would destroy each other so utterly by going to war that peace (even bitter cold peace) is the only viable option. Biological and Chemical weapons, which are also called weapons of mass destruction, do not have this deterrent effect.
How did the USSR intend to protect its self?
The USSR intended to protect itself by building a huge army and by developing nuclear weapons.
Indian rank in nuclear weapons in world?
fifth rank in nuclear weapons
What does nuking mean?
Is means to destroy with nuclear weapons. Destroy by using nuclear weapons of mass destruction!
Are nuclear weapons scary?
Yes. Nuclear weapons are very scary and they can seriously destroy the whole World. This means that they can destroy the whole planet.
What was nuclear deterrence or mutual destruction?
nuclear deterrence - the idea that if you attack me with nuclear weapons then I will attack you back with nuclear weaponsmutual assured destruction - the idea that if you attack me with nuclear weapons then I will totally destroy you with nuclear weapons and if I attack you with nuclear weapons then you will totally destroy me with nuclear weapons - thus any nuclear attack by either party will result in the certain destruction of both parties
Can Nuclear Weapons destroy the World?
While nuclear weapons have the potential to cause massive destruction, it is unlikely that they could destroy the entire world. However, a large-scale nuclear war could have catastrophic consequences for civilization, causing widespread devastation, loss of life, and long-term environmental impacts. Efforts to prevent the use of nuclear weapons are crucial for global security and peace.
Are nuclear weapons effective?
Yes they are very effective. Nuclear weapons are dangerous and really effective to destroy all life on earth. They are very powerful.
What are the disadvantages of building nuclear weapons and plants?
Well their are no disadvantages to nuclear plants, if your using them for nuclear power, as nuclear power is the safest type of energy in modern times. However disadvantages of nuclear weapons include well the ending of the planet, the possibility of it being stolen by terrorists or even it being spied on for another nation so it can create nuclear weapons.
Does America have enough nuclear weapons to destroy the world?
To destroy the planet (as in blow it into pieces), no. But to destroy all live on the surface, yes.
Can Nuclear weapons destroy the entire earth?
No, nuclear weapons do not have the capability to destroy the entire Earth. While they have devastating power and can cause widespread destruction, they are not capable of wiping out the entire planet.
Should the south African government destroy all its nuclear weapons?
It has already been done. South Africa dismantled its 6 nuclear weapons in 1991.
Can Nuclear Weapons destroy the World and the planet?
Nuclear weapons have the potential to cause massive devastation, including widespread destruction and loss of life. However, it is unlikely that they could completely destroy the world or the planet itself. The use of nuclear weapons would have catastrophic consequences with long-lasting impacts on the environment and civilization.
Should you destroy all nuclear weapons?
nuclear weapons should not be destroyed they should be improved by my finding in 2023 there will be an alien attack on the united states of america, #getpussy
Why don't Jamaica have nuclear weapons?
Nuclear weapons are very expensive. Jamaica does not have nearly the kind of economy that permits the building or purchase of such expensive weapons. And nobody is going to invade Jamaica anyway. Jamaica does not need nuclear weapons.
