To kill people, yes.
But more importantly flamethrowers were an efficient way of lowering the enemy's morale. It would scare most soldiers, and it was used more as an intimidation tactic ,than an actual weapon since range is limited and you would probably die from using one.
If one single bullet hit the tank it would make it explode, and also there was the risk of getting fire in your own face due to the wind, etc.
England won so theres your answer
World War II, Korean and Vietnam Wars,
The exact number of deaths caused by flamethrowers in World War I is difficult to determine, as detailed records on specific weapon-related fatalities were not consistently kept. However, it is estimated that flamethrowers were responsible for a relatively small number of deaths compared to other weapons, with some reports suggesting that they killed several hundred soldiers during the conflict. Flamethrowers were primarily used for clearing trenches and bunkers, rather than as a primary weapon of mass destruction.
Flamethrowers were not effective in World War I primarily due to the challenges of mobility and the prevailing trench warfare tactics. Their limited range and the need for operators to get close to enemy positions made them vulnerable to counterattacks. Additionally, the effectiveness of flamethrowers was hindered by the muddy and unstable terrain, which often made it difficult to maneuver and deploy them effectively. Lastly, the psychological impact was significant, but the actual tactical utility was limited in the context of the war's overall strategies.
Poison gas, tanks, flamethrowers and machine guns was introduced in World War 1.The main causes of WW1 is Nationalism, Imperialism, Alliances, and Militarism.
-37
England won so theres your answer
World War II, Korean and Vietnam Wars,
It was Germany that first used flamethrowers as weapons in World War I.
Bayonets were quite popular for trench raiding. Elite units used early flamethrowers for the same purpose
grossflamen flamethrower and
flamethrowers, gas masks and posion gas, graneds,submarines and torpedos.
Learn to write in English first, and your question will be answered.
The exact number of deaths caused by flamethrowers in World War I is difficult to determine, as detailed records on specific weapon-related fatalities were not consistently kept. However, it is estimated that flamethrowers were responsible for a relatively small number of deaths compared to other weapons, with some reports suggesting that they killed several hundred soldiers during the conflict. Flamethrowers were primarily used for clearing trenches and bunkers, rather than as a primary weapon of mass destruction.
Flamethrowers were not effective in World War I primarily due to the challenges of mobility and the prevailing trench warfare tactics. Their limited range and the need for operators to get close to enemy positions made them vulnerable to counterattacks. Additionally, the effectiveness of flamethrowers was hindered by the muddy and unstable terrain, which often made it difficult to maneuver and deploy them effectively. Lastly, the psychological impact was significant, but the actual tactical utility was limited in the context of the war's overall strategies.
Because infinity ward made modern warfare one and two, triarch made world at war and black ops, triarch likes flamethrowers, infinity ward does not.
Poison gas, tanks, flamethrowers and machine guns was introduced in World War 1.The main causes of WW1 is Nationalism, Imperialism, Alliances, and Militarism.