The US did not want to risk a nuclear confrontation with the communist superpowers.
There actually was no fighting, as it just was a standoff between Russia (Soviet Union at the time) and The U.S, both superpowers with nuclear weapons. So there you go.
The clearest precedent for the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT) of the 1970s was the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) signed in 1968. The NPT established a framework for the control and limitation of nuclear weapons and paved the way for negotiations on nuclear disarmament and arms control. It provided a model for the superpowers to engage in discussions and seek agreements to prevent an arms race and reduce the risk of nuclear conflict.
The superpowers each thought that the other was going to attack them. As one of them increased their stock of nuclear weapons, the other did so as well. In case of war, each side wanted to have more nukes than the other to assure their enemy's destruction. At the same time fear increased and as each country got more nukes tensions were higher. It was also a battle between Captialism and Communism ideology.
Cold War
Nuclear weapons are governed by international agreements such as the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), which aims to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. Additionally, there are regional and bilateral agreements that regulate the use and possession of nuclear weapons among specific countries. Some countries also have domestic laws pertaining to nuclear weapons possession and testing.
The US did not want to risk a nuclear confrontation with the communist superpowers.
The US has refrained from using nuclear weapons due to the catastrophic human and environmental consequences associated with their use. Additionally, the world community, including the US, has generally upheld international agreements and norms that seek to prevent the use of nuclear weapons.
To limit the supply of nuclear weapons made and owned by superpowers.
?
To limit the supply of nuclear weapons made and owned by superpowers.
Two points to make out here: one, it's what WERE they afraid of, and two,well, only total nuclear chaos. Russia has nuclear weapons, too, you know.
There actually was no fighting, as it just was a standoff between Russia (Soviet Union at the time) and The U.S, both superpowers with nuclear weapons. So there you go.
The clearest precedent for the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT) of the 1970s was the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) signed in 1968. The NPT established a framework for the control and limitation of nuclear weapons and paved the way for negotiations on nuclear disarmament and arms control. It provided a model for the superpowers to engage in discussions and seek agreements to prevent an arms race and reduce the risk of nuclear conflict.
The superpowers each thought that the other was going to attack them. As one of them increased their stock of nuclear weapons, the other did so as well. In case of war, each side wanted to have more nukes than the other to assure their enemy's destruction. At the same time fear increased and as each country got more nukes tensions were higher. It was also a battle between Captialism and Communism ideology.
Nuclear weapons deter by creating the threat of massive destruction and loss of life if they are used. The potential consequences of a nuclear war act as a powerful deterrent against aggression and conflict between nuclear-armed states. The fear of mutual destruction compels nations to avoid escalating disputes to the point of nuclear conflict.
Cold War