The strength of the north during the Civil War was its size. Although the South had great leadership with General Robert E. Lee, the North was able to use its resources (large size, better weapons) to their advantage. A few examples are Grant winning in Vicksburg, William Tecumseh's march to the sea, and Meade helping with the turning point of the war, Gettysburg. Gettysburg worked because of a great execution of tactics using the high ground in the area. So, in conclusion, the North's strength in the Civil war was their use of resources and tactical abilities.
The North's greatest strength or resource during the Civil War was its industry.
In the civil war, the North was called the Union.
During the Civil War the North had better manufacturing abilities. The superior industries was one reason the North finally won the war.
With the exception of the air war over the north, the ground war occurred in southern territory. The north invaded the south, the south didn't invade the north.
north viet nam, you cannot fight a limited war and win, as is going on in Iraq presently.
The North - by a long way.
Speaking about the North as it pertains to the US Civil War, one great strength was its huge population of 23,000,000 vs the South's 11,000,000. Also about four million of the South's population were slaves.
The North's greatest strength or resource during the Civil War was its industry.
The states that remained part of the United States and fought the Confederacy during the Civil War.
In the US Civil War, the North had the advantage in population and industry. The South had the advantage of better officers, and that they were defending their homes.
Germany
At the outset of the American Civil War, America's main strength lay in its vast industrial capacity and resource abundance, particularly in the North. The Union had superior railroads, which facilitated faster troop movement and supply distribution. Additionally, the North's larger population provided a significant manpower advantage over the Confederacy. This combination of industrial strength and logistical capabilities positioned the Union favorably for prolonged conflict.
Almost half correct but sort of turned around a bit. The Korean War began that way in 1950. The Vietnam war began by infiltration in 1955 (slowly escalating in guerrilla buildup and strength). The Vietnam war ended by a North Vietnamese Army invasion of RVN (Republic of South Vietnam).
They were waging a defensive war.
During the Civil War, the economy of the North was characterized by industrial strength and a more extensive railroad network, which facilitated the efficient movement of troops and supplies. The North's economy benefitted from a diversified industrial base, allowing for increased production of weapons, ammunition, and other war materials. Additionally, the North experienced fewer disruptions to agriculture compared to the South, enabling it to maintain a stable food supply. Overall, these factors contributed to the North's ability to sustain its war effort more effectively than the South.
North Vietnam won the war.
Not if the magnet is symmetrical, and you define 'strength' in terms of flux density.Yes because it has a stronger attraction rate.there is no stronger or weaker for a magnet