answersLogoWhite

0

A concerted attack by land sea and air.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Military History

Why didnt lincoln implement his plans for reunifying the nation?

He was assassinated just after the surrender of Lee, which ended the Civil War. His plans had to be put into effect by President Andrew Johnson and others, who had to guess what Lincoln would have wanted.


What was the original main reason for the military expeditions called the Crusades?

Greed and the want for land was the main reason. Religion was the source of inspiration, and the Crusades would never have happened without religioin's influence. Not enough people would have fought.


How much did depth charge cost?

The cost of depth charges varied significantly based on the time period and specific design. During World War II, a single depth charge could range from approximately $300 to $1,000, depending on factors such as size and technology. Adjusted for inflation, this would be several thousand dollars today. However, exact prices may differ based on procurement contracts and military budgets.


Who funds the military?

If it is a government military of a nation for example: British Army, United States Marine Corps, Royal Australian Air Force etc then the Government Defence budjet would be their financial source. If its a private military they would get profit and income revenue from their clients and possibly other sources.


How did Scott's Anaconda Plan use geography and how the North's naval blockade affected the South?

The Anaconda plan was strategically simplistic and of course tactically difficult to implement. It entailed controlling the Mississippi (which would split the Confederacy) and blockading the South to prevent exports (which would be used to pay for weapons).

Related Questions

Which would not be a reason to implement Defense in Depth?

Security dollars are invested in a single solution


What is the following would not be a reason to implement Defense in Depth?

A reason that would not support implementing Defense in Depth is the belief that a single security measure is sufficient to protect against all threats. This mindset underestimates the complexity and variety of potential attacks, making organizations vulnerable. Effective security requires multiple layers of defense to address different attack vectors, rather than relying solely on one solution.


The following would not be a reason to implement Defense in Depth?

A reason that would not support the implementation of Defense in Depth is the belief that a single security measure, such as a firewall or antivirus software, is sufficient on its own to protect against all threats. This approach undermines the concept of layered security, which is designed to provide multiple overlapping defenses to mitigate various risks. Relying solely on one solution can lead to vulnerabilities being exploited if that measure fails.


What is the reason a company would want an apache web server?

The reason a company would want an Apache web server is if you need a quick reference for a command or an in-depth walk through, then you definitely need a Apache web server.


When would you implement hand care procedures?

I would implement hand care when you are working in the health or home environment.


How would you use implement in a sentence?

Ask him or her to implement a policy allowing students to choose a humane alternative.


In compulsory voting an idea whose time has come what reason do opponents of compulsory voting give as to why it would not work in the US?

It would be too difficult to implement.


In which sport would you see a zone defence?

In football


Which cabinet officer would be responsible for terrorism?

Department of defence


Would a black widow bite humans for defence?

yes


Under the Australian Defamation Act 2005 would it be a defence of a defamatory article if it only appeared on the internet?

No, there would be no defence there because articles on the internet are now considered admissible sources


Defence of warwick?

The first defense of Warwick is that the would-be attackers would have to face was the barbican.