george Clooneys fanclub would become a powerful beast and take over weak countries while reenacting the Holocaust except with fans of Will Smith. they will start a new world war over who is people magazines sexiest man in America
With the slavery issue based on popular sovereignty, the territories would become slave or free depending on which side had more votes. Both antislavery Northerners and proslavery Southerners scrambled to settle Kansas. One fierce slavery opponent, John Brown, killed five proslavery people in a raid and started a small civil war that killed some 200 people from both sides.
To gain a lot more territory and power, plus the resources of the territories in which they conquered.
Consider this: Exactly which "people of those territories" wanted expansion of slavery. Definitely not any of the black people. Actually, nearly all the lobbying for slavery came from people living in the South who were anxious to gain more power in the House and Senate for their cause.
Answer this question… German leaders would not settle for controlling only parts of the territories they wanted.
free soilers: their goal was to prohibit slavery only in new territories- many were unconvinced that the whole institution of slavery could be eliminated, some were northerns who did not want to compete economically with slavery in the new territories, others were racist and did not want blacks, free or enslaved, playing a role in westward expansion abolitionists: their goal was to abolish slavery completely they were more into the moral aspect of the issue and generally supported social equality
No there isn't any more US territories that still exists.
If you added one or more organisms to a food web, it would be unbalanced for a time and then a new equilibrium would be reached that might or might not include the organisms that were added.
The Canadian North would more probably be argued to be comprised of none of the provinces, and rather the three territories (i.e., the Northwest Territories, the Yukon Territory, and Nunavut).
Both the Missouri compromises gave the US more time to consider the issue of slavery and whether slavery would be allowed in the new US territories. There is no direct linkage to the last Missouri compromise of 1850 and the US Civil War.
Yes the word territories is a plural noun. The singular noun is territory.
CO2
It would become more basic.
It would slow the object down because it now weighs more.
Not enough prenatal care for women
The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into smaller territories in order to make it more manageable.The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into smaller territories in order to make it more manageable.The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into smaller territories in order to make it more manageable.The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into smaller territories in order to make it more manageable.The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into smaller territories in order to make it more manageable.The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into smaller territories in order to make it more manageable.The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into smaller territories in order to make it more manageable.The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into smaller territories in order to make it more manageable.The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into smaller territories in order to make it more manageable.
13 There were 13 colonies but, later on we added more states.
There are more than 50 different countries and territories where French is spoken. See related links for more information.