The militia participation in the war helped the colonists to become a unified, fighting force quickly, shortening the duration of the conflict
guerrilla is a military warfare that most militias use. militia is groups of people armed with guns The american revolution is a good example of guerrilla warfare and militias Militants are like a basic trained soldier that would only take 2-4 months to train rather 8-12 months plus advanced training So in short terms...No guerrilla and militia is not the same thing
The colonists described this event as a massacre so that the other colonies would join together to get the soldiers off their land.
no
They feared the Communists would win control.
The battle of Bunker Hill was so important because it proved to the British, that the colonists could fight. On the other hand it told the colonist that the war would be hard to put up with.
If the colonist hade lost the war their taxation would go up.
Many colonists believed that a fight with the British would first break out in Lexington and Concord, Massachusetts. These towns were seen as flashpoints for rising tensions, especially after the passage of the Intolerable Acts and increasing British military presence. The British aimed to seize colonial militias' weapons stored in Concord, prompting the confrontation with colonial militias in April 1775. This event marked the beginning of armed conflict between the colonies and Britain.
A person who settles in a colony would be a colonist.
180 pounds
180 pounds
militias
They would say no, but due to Sudan's support of the Arabic militias, i would say yes.
The colonist worried that the states would split up. At first the colonist did not want to be a nation.
Im not really sure? If i was asking why would i put the answer
militias
there would be more protection
No. The game didn't happen until the 1880's, so a colonist would not have known about the game.