The U.S. may become involved in conflict or war with Another Country due to factors such as direct attacks on American soil or military assets, violations of international law, or threats to national security. Additionally, humanitarian crises or the need to support allies under treaty obligations can prompt intervention. Economic interests and the protection of global stability can also play significant roles in the decision to engage in conflict. Ultimately, a combination of these factors, along with public and political support, influences the U.S.'s involvement in international conflicts.
False. A neutral country does not take sides in a conflict and typically refrains from joining forces with either side, regardless of their relative strength. Neutrality means maintaining an impartial stance and avoiding involvement in military actions. Therefore, a neutral country would not necessarily align with the weaker country or any other party involved in the war.
The country of Vietnam had divided into communist North Vietnam and democratic South Vietnam, and was fighting a civil war to determine if the country would be reunified as a communist nation, or if it would remain a divided nation. Untimately, North Vietnam prevailed.
they all thought it would be a short conflict over by Christmas because each country believed it was the strongest because of nationalism and militarism.
a stupid question deserves a stupid answer: Denmark is Denmark who would be stupid enough to ask that question. denmark is a country
The country where most of the fighting would take place often depends on the specific conflict in question. For instance, in recent years, Syria has been a focal point for intense fighting due to its civil war and the involvement of various international actors. Similarly, Ukraine has seen significant conflict following Russia's invasion in 2022. Other regions, like Yemen and Afghanistan, have also been hotspots for prolonged fighting.
The U.S senate did not want the country to join.
I would say if a country has a defensive treaty alliance with another country it would mean that they would not fight with that country, but also that if the country they had the alliance with were to be attacked by another country that they would help to defend them.
Treaties can be used to settle disputes between government officials of one country and citizens of Another Country. They can permit a country to act on behalf of another country in certain circumstances. They can facilitate trade by providing for less duties and taxes than would normally be paid in a cross-border transaction.
Treaties can be used to settle disputes between government officials of one country and citizens of Another Country. They can permit a country to act on behalf of another country in certain circumstances. They can facilitate trade by providing for less duties and taxes than would normally be paid in a cross-border transaction.
There are many different types of conflict such as internal or external. Another example would be perceived conflict which is simply the awareness of a conflict situation.
Madison reasoned that the opposing party would feel victimized that the government is "disregarding the rights of another or the good of the whole," as Madison put it. And this negligence felt by either party would cause conflict not only between the parties, but in the country as well. Also, the people felt factions would rip their beloved country apart, that they fought hard for in the Revolutionary War they just came out of.
The best word I know for that would be chim.
The Vietnam War No, it would have been Korea
There are many conflict methods available to help achieve amicable solutions to disagreements. One such method would be mediation which involves a third party to help mediate the process. Mediation would require all parties to recognize the legitimate abilities of one another.
Each country had a secret alliance with maybe four or five other countries. so if one country declared war on another their allied countries would have to declare war as well.
It is the process of moving into a country from Another Country. So if I live in Russia and want to move to India, I would be immigrating to India. Emigration is the process of leaving a country to go to another country. In the example above, I would be emigrating from Russia and immigrating to India.
A. Latent Conflict-potential B. Perceived Conflict-realizes goals impeded by another party C. Felt Conflict-growing anger D. Manifest Conflict-how to deal with it E. Conflict Aftermath-what would I do differently?