the treaty was the treaty that made Napoleon shorter.
843
It was made so there would be defense in case the Soviet caused an invasion at Western Europe
The Irish Civil War could potentially have been avoided through more effective diplomacy and compromise between the pro-Treaty and anti-Treaty factions following the Anglo-Irish Treaty of 1921. Greater efforts to address the concerns of those opposed to the Treaty, particularly regarding the partition of Ireland and the status of Northern Ireland, might have mitigated tensions. Additionally, a more inclusive political approach that sought to unify various nationalist sentiments could have fostered a more cohesive response to the post-independence challenges. Ultimately, a combination of political miscalculations and deep-seated divisions made conflict likely.
I think they were made by the treaty of Versailles (As your catergory is ww1)
If it is a copy, but no changes have been made, it is a primary source since it is the word of and the work of the treaty makers.
The Korean War. The country was divided on the demilitarized zone. No peace treaty has been made.
the treaty was made in europe.
after a treaty is made
No, the Treaty of Versailles was not effective. In fact it was counterproductive Instead of making another European war impossible, it practically made WW2 inevitable. The treaty was designed to punish and weaken Germany. It succeeded in causing great economic dislocation and bitterness in Germany, without which the Nazis would likely not have managed to seize power.
He made the Treaty with Britain
Before WW2 started Hitler and Russia made a Non Aggression Pact. Hitler actually promised Stalin to invade Poland and share it with Russia.There was a treaty made between the Third Reich and the USSR which was known (for the people who negotiated it) as the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, in which these two powers agree to carve up Eastern Europe and share it between themselves; of course, the treaty was rapidly violated. Had this treaty been honored rather than violated, it is likely that WW II would have had quite a different outcome.
the treaty was the treaty that made Napoleon shorter.
If the North had not won the war, a treaty would have been made which made the Confederate States of America an independent country. The CSA would have kept slavery legal for a long time but escaped slaves would not be returned. All of the history of the US and much of the world's history would be quite different.
the person who made a treaty with Spain was Alexander Hamilton
Seward made the Japanese-American Treaty.
Most likely the ark would have been brownish and black, since it was made of wood and covered with pitch.