To determine which side was better prepared for a specific conflict, one would need to analyze factors such as military strategy, resources, logistics, and morale. Often, the side with superior training, advanced technology, and effective supply chains tends to have the upper hand. Historical context, intelligence capabilities, and alliances also play crucial roles in assessing preparedness. Ultimately, a comprehensive evaluation of these elements is essential for a fair comparison.
the north side was more prepared , well they had more man,nurses,supplies.things that will help them win the war.
The north
Neither side was prepared for war - there were no big, trained armies. But the strategy suggested by the elderly Union General-in-Chief (The slow 'Anaconda Plan') was actually the most realistic proposal, and in the end the North carried out something very similar.
The Union or Northern side of the conflict.
The country will support the side it's on.
the north side was more prepared , well they had more man,nurses,supplies.things that will help them win the war.
On the positive side, he is a discreet, knowledgeable and skilled lawyer. On the negative side he was a man to reverence/or so it seemed" and "was less busy than he seemed to be."
The north
During the conflict, the losing side requested an armistice.
the left side and the right side
Spinach is a side dish to be prepared along side a dinner.
it is left out side to dry by aaron saund
It means to be neutral. Not to take someones side
Neither side was prepared for war - there were no big, trained armies. But the strategy suggested by the elderly Union General-in-Chief (The slow 'Anaconda Plan') was actually the most realistic proposal, and in the end the North carried out something very similar.
Impartiality
the internal conflict is not being able to have his family to help him grow as an individual
a good movie to show students about conflict is...BLIND SIDE!