The majority of casualties other than the obvious war casualties came from being in captivity, starvation, and hypothermia.
The statement means that the Hoods Arm was luckier than any other army because it did not lose many casualties.
The British had more than 55,000 casualties, and German casualties are estimated at 45,000.
According to recent numerical research and records, the north had a few more casualties than the south during the Civil War, or the battle between North and South. The south suffered 490,309 soldiers killed, wounded, captured or missing, while the north suffered 596,670.
The battle cost more brutal than people expected
The majority of casualties other than the obvious war casualties came from being in captivity, starvation, and hypothermia.
The statement means that the Hoods Arm was luckier than any other army because it did not lose many casualties.
Because, all of the casualties were American, on both sides.
If you mean what war had the most US casualties is was the Civil War, over 700,000. More than other wars that have happened since combined.
The British had more than 55,000 casualties, and German casualties are estimated at 45,000.
Russia
The US Civil War had more American casualties than any other war; hence the US President in power during the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln, would have had the most troops die under his administration.
allied forces : less than 2000
According to recent numerical research and records, the north had a few more casualties than the south during the Civil War, or the battle between North and South. The south suffered 490,309 soldiers killed, wounded, captured or missing, while the north suffered 596,670.
According to recent numerical research and records, the north had a few more casualties than the south during the Civil War, or the battle between North and South. The south suffered 490,309 soldiers killed, wounded, captured or missing, while the north suffered 596,670.
About more than 2,000 people
The battle cost more brutal than people expected