Please rewrite. We need a year to answer.
it would prevent high casualties that would be caused by an invasion of mainland japan
There are no figures for the total number of casualties caused by machine guns in WW1. But an internet search found an example of the effectiveness of the weapon - On the first day of the Somme Offensive, the British lost 60.000 soldiers mostly due to machine gun fire.
Antietam
The exact number of people killed by tanks in World War I is difficult to determine, as tanks were a new technology and their use varied greatly throughout the war. However, it is estimated that tanks were responsible for several thousand casualties, primarily among enemy soldiers. The introduction of tanks changed the dynamics of warfare, contributing to both their own losses and the overall death toll of the conflict. Overall, while tanks caused fatalities, they were just one factor in the massive scale of WWI casualties, which totaled around 16 million deaths.
The new weapon that caused the most casualties in World War I was the machine gun. Its ability to fire hundreds of rounds per minute allowed for devastating firepower on the battlefield, leading to massive losses during trench warfare. The widespread use of machine guns contributed to the high casualty rates, as they were effective in defending positions and repelling infantry charges. This technological advancement fundamentally changed military tactics and the nature of warfare during the conflict.
competition & culture
the decision to drop the bombs caused the Japanese surrender. This prevented massive casualties on both sides in the Operation Downfall invasion of Japan and from an otherwise prolonged war.
it caused high civilian casualties but did not result in surrender
it would prevent high casualties that would be caused by an invasion of mainland japan
People get shot,sniped and,bombed! That's how most of the casualties are caused in the war
Because the Union Army caused so much damage and Confederate casualties that the Confederacy was no longer able to operate offensively.Because the Union Army caused so much damage and Confederate casualties that the Confederacy was no longer able to operate offensively.Because the Union Army caused so much damage and Confederate casualties that the Confederacy was no longer able to operate offensively.Because the Union Army caused so much damage and Confederate casualties that the Confederacy was no longer able to operate offensively.Because the Union Army caused so much damage and Confederate casualties that the Confederacy was no longer able to operate offensively.Because the Union Army caused so much damage and Confederate casualties that the Confederacy was no longer able to operate offensively.
the maxim gun
There are no figures for the total number of casualties caused by machine guns in WW1. But an internet search found an example of the effectiveness of the weapon - On the first day of the Somme Offensive, the British lost 60.000 soldiers mostly due to machine gun fire.
The 1909 eruption of Mount Teide in Tenerife, Spain, caused limited damage as it was primarily a fissure eruption with lava flows and minor explosive activity. The eruption mainly affected uninhabited areas and did not result in any casualties.
Antietam
Shock is usually caused by trauma, blood loss, dehydration or massive infection
60,000 casualties, 20,000 of which were deaths just on the 1st July 1916 (first day of the battle) 680,000 Germans lost their lives in the battle. 204,000 French died (more at Verdun) 420,000 British troops lost their lives. A total of 1304000 men died fighting the battle of the Somme.