answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Because any and all available weapons were used; including chemical warfare.

No. The concept of Total War has nothing to do with the exact methods of fighting. Rather it concerns how the civilian and government institutions are involved in the war. Under the Total War concept, the entire nation's economy and population are mobilized and directed to support the military. That is, the whole country is involved in the war, not just the actual military. Total War is an outgrowth of the Industrial Revolution - as militaries became dependent on massive amounts of manufactured goods, it became necessary to direct the entire output of the nation to support the continued fighting of one's armed services.

World War One (a.k.a The Great War) is a prime example of a Total War - the entire economic output of all countries on both sides was taken under government control, and planned to maximize output of military goods to support that country's military. Whole civilian populations were effectively drafted into factories and farms to produce specific goods for use by the military, rather than civilian, sectors. In effect, no economic activity was allowed which did not support the war effort in some manner, and the whole of economic production was tailored to fit military demands.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

The concept of Total War is one in which both sides of the war (in this case, the United States and the state of South Vietnam versus the Vietcong insurgents backed by the state of North Vietnam) fight not just soldier to soldier on the battlefield, but also seek to destroy the enemy nation's economy, morale and infrastructure. The concept of Total War in one which seeks to end the war as quickly as possible by using every means a nation has to bring the enemy to defeat. Generally though, this umbrella of combat options does not include nuclear weapons.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Answer this question… They both mobilized entire populations in support of the war effort.

This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

ohwhoisshe

Lvl 1
1y ago
Apex correct!

User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
4y ago

ideas is an important part of the fascist ideology?

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why was the Vietnam War considered a total war?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why was the Vietnam war considered a Civil War?

because it was north Vietnam against south Vietnam


Could the Vietnam war be considered a draw?

No. The Korean War was a draw, but Vietnam was won by the communists.


Republican hawks called for what in Vietnam?

Total War- Apex


Republican hawks called for in Vietnam.?

The Republican "hawks" wanted total war in Vietnam.


Which was never declared a war but rather was considered only a conflict?

Vietnam War


What was Total cost Vietnam war?

The total Cost of the Vietnam War was around 200 billion dollars. no it was over 350 billion dollars


Was Iraq war considered a total war?

The last TOTAL war was WWII.


Find the identity of the Vietnam war?

Limited war (not total war). Total war implied using all available means (nuclear weapons).


The total black people in the Vietnam war?

their was a total of 20 billion people in the Vietnam war and 48000 blacks and don't know how many whites


Why is the Vietnam war considered unsuccessful?

It wasn't "unsuccessful" according the communists; they won the war.


Is total war and complete battlefield the same?

Total war is all out war; including the use of atomic weapons. The Korean War and the Vietnam War were LIMITED WARs, "No Atomic Weapons."


Vietnam war total caluaties?

About 211,472 casualties.