answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The British colonists were upset with the French in the Indian War because of the French's involvement in North America. The French had established a strong presence in the region, constructing forts and trading posts along the waterways. This posed a threat to the British, who wanted to expand their own trading and settlement in the area, and to the Native Americans, who were wary of the Europeans' encroachment on their ancestral lands. The British colonists saw the French influence in the region as a challenge to their own ambitions and objectives. The following factors led to the British colonists' dissatisfaction with the French:

  • The French had a strong presence in the region with forts and trading posts
  • The French presence posed a threat to the British and Native American interests
  • The British colonists saw the French as a challenge to their own ambitions and objectives

The tension between the British and French in North America eventually led to the Indian War, where the colonists sought to gain control of the region and protect their interests.

User Avatar

Gregorio Lind

Lvl 13
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why were the British colonists upset with the French in the Indian war?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Military History

What is Biff's reaction when he discovers his father is trying to kill himself?

He's upset at his father.


What effect the Napoleonic wars have on the european community?

They upset the balance of power that Europe had struggled with for centuries and the newly unified Germanic States and the destroyed French Empire added a new twist to European politics.The effects of the Napoleonic Wars upon the European community, as well as on the entire world, were quite numerous. For example, economic and political realities were shaped in many significant ways. Perhaps the most significant effect, however, was the rise of the British Empire to super-power status: it dominated world affairs without significant competition for the next one hundred years.


What conflicting attitude does Rowlandson reveal toward her captors?

at first she was upset because she thought that the Indians were animals but as time passed she changed her mind


What weapons were used at the cawnpore massacre?

This was a particularly horrible part of the 1857 Indian Mutiny (or war of independence in some people's eyes). Until that year, mostly Indian princes and rulers since India wasn't ruled by Britain per se, but Britain had a lot of control through the East India Company). After several disagreements on both sides, eventually rumours of tallow fat on weapon cartridges (Cows are a sacred animal to Hindus) and lard as well (pigs are unclean to Muslims) sparked off the rebellion, which began in a vast scale of destruction, partly led by the Indian princes and rulers, but often very disorganised and violent. During the rebellion, a British garrison at Cawnpore held out against the rebel sepoys until they were granted passage to barges to take them away to safety. As they reached the barges, the sepoys opened fire on the British, and cavalry rode into the water, cutting down the men. Only one barge escaped. After this, the leader, an Indian ruler called 'Nana Sahib' held the surviving women and children prisoner in a building called the 'bibigarh'. When he learned that the British forces were closing in on Cawnpore, he ordered the women and children to be killed. There was some disagreement among the sepoys, but they went to the house, and couldn't get inside because the women had barricaded the door. They fired high on purpose, so Nana Sahib sent for local Muslim butchers in to kill the women and children (even small babies weren't spared). They went in with axes and knives and sliced them up, dumping the remains in a well. A couple of surviving children were chased outside and caught by the Sepoys who quickly beheaded them. The British forces arrived at Cawnpore too late to prevent the massacre, and were shocked and stunned by what they found. The massacre upset them so much that the effect on them was incredible. Any Indian mutineers caught were shown no mercy, and all Indians were treated with suspicion that warranted their murder in return. And that's the full story on one of the worst parts of British-Indian history.


Did remilitarization contribute to the outbreak of World War 2?

The Nazi Party efforts to remilitarize did contribute to the outbreak of World War 2. They were not supposed to do that under the Treaty of the Versailles. They they invaded Poland they broke the point that said they could not wage war against other nations. This also broke the Munich Pact. This upset the UK and the French peoples. Thus the war was sparked.

Related questions

Why were Ottawa people upset with the outcome of the French and Indian War?

They did not want French traders continue living on their land.


Why did the French build three forts in the Ohio River Valley during the French and Indian War?

To stop the expansion of British colonists. The french were upset of the colonials continuous encroachment onto french land. This was not during the French and Indian War, but a prelude of what is to come.


How did the results of the French and Indian war lead to conflict between the colonists and England?

New taxes were imposed by the king.


What did colonists do to upset the British?

The colonists were British and when they declared independence they were seen as traitors by the king.


What did the british government do that the American colonist strongly objected to?

The American colonists objected to many things the British burdened them with. Taxes were a sore point. Long before the "revolution fever" took root, the colonists were upset that they would be taxed to offset the costs incurred by the Crown in the French and Indian War.


Why were the Americans upset with the British?

The American colonists were upset because the British government started to tax the Americans.


Why were british colonist upset about the stamp act?

Some British colonists were upset, because they were imposed a tax without their voice in the British Parliament.


Why were American colonists upset with British rule?

Britain taxed them


What act was not passed by the British that upset the colonists?

stamp act


What did the British parliament do that upset the American colonialists?

taxesgovernment had to much controlstates did not have a lot of power


Why did the stamp act upset the American colonists?

Some British colonists were upset, because they were imposed a tax without their voice in the British Parliament.


Why were the Colonists upset when the British taxed them with the Proclamation of 1763?

I know this one! Our class just learned it like a few weeks ago. The colonists were upset when the British taxed them with the Proclamation of 1763 because they thought it was unfair.