answersLogoWhite

0

Yes, because letters and diaries of soldiers would be considered what is called a primary source. A primary source is a document or artefact created at the time of the event. This means that letters and diaries of soldiers would be considered accurate historical evidence.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Military History

How did the soldiers in World War I express their feelings?

The soldiers wrote letters for their friends and family at home, wrote poems that said wha the soldiers felt and wrote in their own diaries. For some great info go to...www.bbc.co.uk/history/~isla x


When was Buedingen Germany taken over by Americans during World War 2?

From what I can find it was April 5th, 1945 but that is from diaries of soldiers that fought there.


Which type of source would you consult for soldier's accounts of war in obscure terrain?

For soldier's accounts of war in obscure terrain, you would consult primary sources such as memoirs, diaries, or letters written by soldiers who experienced the conflict firsthand. Military oral histories and interviews can also provide valuable insights into personal experiences. Additionally, specialized historical books or journals that focus on specific battles or campaigns may offer curated accounts from multiple soldiers, enriching your understanding of the context and challenges faced.


What is the symbolism of Dork Diaries?

what is the symbolism in the dork diaries 3


How have we learned about soldiers firsthand expiriences during the civil war?

We have learned about soldiers' firsthand experiences during the Civil War primarily through letters, diaries, and memoirs. Many soldiers kept detailed accounts of their daily lives, battles, and emotions, which provide valuable insights into their thoughts and feelings. Additionally, photographs and official records, such as military reports and veterans' testimonies, further enrich our understanding of their experiences. This personal documentation allows historians to piece together the human side of the conflict, highlighting both the hardships and camaraderie among soldiers.

Related Questions

What kinds of objects can be considered historical evidence?

Letters, pictures, diaries.


What does primary evidence mean in the historical term?

Primary evidence in historical terms refers to original documents or physical artifacts created during the time period being studied. This can include letters, photographs, official records, speeches, and diaries, as well as objects like tools or clothing. Such evidence provides direct insight into the thoughts, actions, and events of the past, making it invaluable for historians in constructing accurate narratives and interpretations. It contrasts with secondary evidence, which analyzes or interprets primary sources.


What evidence is there to support historical events?

Historical events are supported by various types of evidence, including primary sources such as letters, diaries, and official documents created during the time. Archaeological findings, such as artifacts and ruins, also provide tangible proof of past societies. Additionally, secondary sources, like history books and scholarly articles, analyze and interpret primary evidence to construct a narrative of events. Collectively, these forms of evidence help historians validate and understand historical occurrences.


What do historians rely on?

Historians rely on primary sources (such as letters, diaries, and government documents), secondary sources (like books and scholarly articles), archaeology, and oral histories to construct and interpret the past. They also use critical thinking skills to analyze and evaluate historical evidence in order to form accurate and balanced conclusions.


Which texts is valuable for gathering context about historical event but is unreliable as evidence?

Memoirs or personal diaries are valuable for providing context about historical events, but they are considered unreliable as evidence because they can be biased, subjective, or incomplete. These texts often reflect the author's personal perspective and may not always present a complete or objective view of the events they describe.


What are the release dates for Battlefield Diaries - 2003 Last of the Buffalo Soldiers 1-5?

Battlefield Diaries - 2003 Last of the Buffalo Soldiers 1-5 was released on: USA: 17 January 2005


One area of study that requires the use of many primary sources when presenting a topic would be?

the field of history. Historians often rely on primary sources such as letters, diaries, and official documents to gain firsthand accounts and evidence of past events. By analyzing these sources, historians can construct a more accurate and nuanced understanding of historical events and their significance.


What evidence shows that the slave rebelled?

Evidence of slave rebellion can be found in historical records, such as letters, diaries, and newspapers that document the events. Additionally, archaeological evidence, such as artifacts related to armed resistance or fortified structures, can also indicate rebellion. Oral histories and folklore passed down within communities may also provide insight into slave rebellions.


When did the soldiers in World War 1 have time to write in their diaries?

at night when they were sleeping or just bord


What is chronological source?

A chronological source is a type of historical document or artifact that presents information in the order of events as they occurred over time. This can include diaries, timelines, or historical records that detail events sequentially. Such sources help researchers understand the context and progression of events, allowing for a clearer analysis of historical trends and developments. They are essential for constructing accurate narratives of the past.


Are the royal diaries fiction?

yes but then no Royal Diaries are normally found and then a author will spruce it up and add fictional things to it. Making it historical fiction which some of it is real and some not.


What sources of historical evidence would most help the historian form a historical argument?

Historians benefit from a variety of sources to form robust historical arguments, including primary sources such as letters, diaries, official documents, and photographs, which provide firsthand accounts of events. Secondary sources, like scholarly articles and books, offer interpretations and analyses built on primary evidence, helping to contextualize historical events. Oral histories and artifacts also enrich understanding by providing diverse perspectives and material culture insights. Together, these sources enable historians to construct well-rounded and nuanced narratives.