mos and twy team
forgein means a object for example i have a forgein plant in my garden or an animal whatever it just means that! by............................................................................................ thank you all
it jumps the fence
Yes, you are responsible for all the damage caused by your accident therefore if an object you hit goes on to cause further damage as a result of being hit then you are responsible for all the damage.
More than likely, yes. The car was the responsibility of the person driving it at the time of damage, regardless of the circumstances. You are NOT liable for any part of the damage (including deductible) as long as you are driving with your friend's permission. No, you are not responsible for the damage.
FOD (Foreign Object Damage) removal is the responsibility of all ground-crew members, and anyone tasked for the job by authority personnel at the airfield.
-Carving: The sculptor starts with a block of material, and chips any un-needed parts of this material to create an object. -Casting: In this process the sculptor starts by making a mold, and pours a melted metal onto the material. -Modeling: Building up a shape...DUH!:) -Assembling: The sculptor constructs the object. Thanks!!
The damage to the wall was caused by a heavy object falling onto it.
The purpose is to prevent foreign object damage.
The force of gravity is most responsible for the path of an object during projectile motion. It causes the object to follow a curved trajectory as it is pulled towards the center of the Earth.
Each object should be responsible for its own logic and data, and so each object's tests should be responsible for its own tests. The top-down approach is the polar opposite of this design, as the top level object would be responsible for testing all of its enclosed objects. This works well in procedural programming, but explicitly violates the concepts of object oriented programming, which states that no object should be concerned about the details of any other object's internal design.
Each object should be responsible for its own logic and data, and so each object should be responsible for its own test. The top-down approach is the polar opposite of this design, as the top level object would be responsible for testing all of its enclosed objects. This works well in procedural programming, but explicitly violates the concepts of object oriented programming, which states that no object should be concerned about the details of any other object's internal design.
Bird collisions