The Hercules requires more thrust from its engines than the Twin Otter primarily due to its larger size, heavier payload capacity, and greater mission capabilities. As a military transport aircraft, the Hercules is designed to carry larger loads over longer distances and in more challenging conditions, necessitating more powerful engines for adequate performance. Additionally, the Hercules often operates from shorter or less improved airstrips, which further demands higher thrust during takeoff and landing. In contrast, the Twin Otter, being smaller and designed for regional flights, operates with lower thrust requirements.
Liquid rocket engines would act much like a car engine. More fuel, more thrust. Solid rocket engines are either on or off. No throttle control.
Well, thrust is propel something forward. There are 4 different types of thrust, that is ....a)Propeller b)Jet engine c)Rocket engines d)ramjet engines... Check this website out to know more about thrust =http://www.boeing.com/companyoffices/aboutus/community/fof_thrust.html
It can be either or. In terms of on aircraft, it depends on where an engine is located on an airplane. Engines on the wings of an aircraft (like a DC-3 or a Hercules cargo airplane) generate a push. Engines on a CF-18 Hornet or an F-15 Phantom are also engines that generate a push-type of thrust because the engine is located closer to the rear of the fuselage. However, single-prop airplanes like a Cessna bush plane or a Spit-fire generate more of a pulling thrust since the engine is in front of the fuselage.
The thrust of a solid rocket engine depends on the composition of the solid fuel and the rate at which it is burned, and to some extent on the way the gases are directed by the exhaust nozzles. The same material can be burned at different rates to produce more or less thrust, and the nozzles (also used for directional control) can divert this thrust to control velocity and stability.
747 uses 4 for forward thrust and at least one or 2 more for electricity and utilities
Sort of. Some planes can reverse the thrust of their engines. Propeller aircraft can change the pitch of their propellers so it can "bit" more air. Some can be reverses in pitch so that it is provide zero thrust.
Propulsion engines and aerodynamics. In slightly more detail it's down to the amount of thrust from the engines and the special shape of the body and wings of the plane that allows it to fly.
The more horsepower you have, the more thrust you will be able to produce. The more horsepower you have, the more thrust you will be able to produce.
The B-52H has eight Pratt & Whitney TF33-P-3 turbofan engines, each providing more than 17,000lb of thrust.
I think mammals... but I am not 100% sure...
This information should be available on the Boeing website or other avaition-related websites. For a quick answer, I will related my experiences from 1970's. Boeing certified the B747-200 to operate with General Electric CF6-50 engines. During take-off power, each GE engine could produce 56,000 lbs of thrust per enginer: or 224,000 lbs for a few minutes. Now, the larger B747-400 a/c have more powerful engines. Currently each engine on a Boeing 747-400 can generate a maximum of about 63,300 lbs of thrust. Accordingly, since this aircraft has four engines it can produce total thrust of about 253,000 lbs.
The thrust of a solid rocket engine depends on the composition of the solid fuel and the rate at which it is burned, and to some extent on the way the gases are directed by the exhaust nozzles. The same material can be burned at different rates to produce more or less thrust, and the nozzles (also used for directional control) can divert this thrust to control velocity and stability.