You have to modify square gutter corners by either cutting and subtracting from them to reduce the angle, or combining two corners to increase the angle. You can always fabricate your own from straight gutter.
No. It's a squashed square ... with 4 equal sides but vertices that aren't "corners".
It is very possible considering non-closed shapes. For example, picture the letter "M" but drawn into the third dimension, sort of like a open roof gutter (which has 2 corners and 3 sides). It will have 3 corners and 4 sides (an "L" would have 1 corner and 2 sides).
A diagonal is a line connecting two (non adjacent) vertices or corners. So the answer is two.
Theres 2. One on the horizontal and one on the vertical. The only difference is you cant go from the corners.
There are six main types of gutter guards, which are reverse curve, mesh, bottle brush, nylon, foam, and the non-gutter cover. Each has its own distinct advantages. It depends on the type of weather and what type of debris it needs to stop.
-- The four corners of a square are non-collinear. -- The four corners of a rectangle are non-collinear. -- The four vertices of any rhombus, parallelogram, or quadrilateral are non-collinear. -- Any four vertices of any polygon with more than 3 sides are non-collinear. -- The three vertices of any triangle are non-collinear, and they stay that way when you add any other point on the same piece of paper. -- Any four points on any circle, ellipse, parabola, or hyperbola are non-collinear. -- If at least one point is on a different floor of the house from the other three, then the four points are non-collinear. -- Make three dots on a piece of paper. Cover them up. Walk away for a few minutes. Come back. Make another dot on the paper. Uncover the first three. We're almost positive that the four dots are non-collinear.
It is not a perfect square.
It is not a perfect square.
Any shadow cast by a square is non-circular.
No. 2.25 = 1.5^2 is a non-perfect square but it is rational.
There is no "best" approximation. The square root is irrational and so it is a non-terminating, non-recurring decimal so adding one more digit will always make it a better approximation.
It can be. 7 is a non-perfect square and, being an integer, it is rational.