No. Many frequencies of light are absorbed by the atmosphere, and so Earth-based telescopes can't detect it. That's why space telescopes such as the Hubble are so valuable; they allow us to see in frequencies that we cannot detect here on Earth.
As far as I know, there is no "optical radio telescope". There are, separately, optical telescopes (which work with visible light), and radio telescopes (which work with radio waves).
Current telescopes detect different wavelengths of "light," which, in general, is called electromagnetic radiation. Earth's atmosphere is transparent to infrared radiation - it can easily transmit though our atmosphere. Therefore we can easily detect it from within Earth's atmosphere. However, X-Rays do not easily transmit through the Earth's atmosphere, so we must place our X-Ray detectors OUTSIDE of our atmosphere, ie. in orbit around the earth.
Deserts usually have little cloud cover and humidity, both of which interfere with visibility. Most telescopes are located far from cities so there is little light pollution.
Photoreceptors that detect light and dark, as well as shades of gray, are called rods. Rods are highly sensitive to light and allow for vision in low-light conditions, but they do not detect color. They are one of the two main types of photoreceptors in the retina, the other being cones, which are responsible for color vision.
The two types are refractor and reflector. In a refracting telescope, the light comes in THROUGH a magnifying LENS where it is REFRACTED (bent) to focus the light into an objective lens. In a reflecting telescope, the light BOUNCES OFF a curved magnifying MIRROR , and then reflected again on a secondary mirror to direct the light into an objective lens. Among the advantages of a reflecting telescope are that in a refracting lens, the thickness of the lens can absorb some of the light, while a mirror reflects all of the light. Additionally, a reflecting telescope can "fold" the telescope into a much more compact instrument, which is essential with especially large devices. A large refracting telescope would be enormously heavy and cumbersome.
Ability to detect radio waves is not a property of optical telescopes. Optical telescopes are designed to detect and focus visible light to form images of distant objects in space. Radio telescopes, on the other hand, are specifically designed to detect and study radio waves emitted by celestial objects.
Telescopes can not detect any radiation for which they were not specifically built. For example, a radio telescope is specifically designed to detect radio waves. Also, telescopes can not detect radiation that is too faint for them. What is too faint depends on the capabilities of the telescope.
Telescopes can be designed to detect various wavelengths and frequencies of light, not just visible light. Different types of telescopes, such as radio telescopes and X-ray telescopes, are specialized to observe different parts of the electromagnetic spectrum beyond visible light. By focusing on specific wavelengths and frequencies, telescopes can provide valuable information about celestial objects and phenomena.
Light telescopes, such as optical telescopes, focus on visible light to observe celestial objects, while radio telescopes detect radio waves emitted by these objects. The design of optical telescopes involves lenses or mirrors to collect and concentrate light, whereas radio telescopes use large parabolic dishes to capture and amplify radio signals. Additionally, optical telescopes are limited by atmospheric conditions and light pollution, while radio telescopes can operate effectively through clouds and at night. This leads to different applications and discoveries in astronomy for each type of telescope.
Radio telescopes do not detect visible light; instead, they observe radio waves emitted by astronomical objects. These telescopes use large antennas to capture and analyze the radio frequencies, allowing astronomers to study phenomena such as pulsars, quasars, and cosmic microwave background radiation. By focusing on non-visible wavelengths, radio telescopes provide a different perspective on the universe that complements data gathered from optical telescopes.
Radio telescopes and infra-red telescopes operate at longer wavelengths/lower frequencies than visible light. Ultraviolet telescopes operate at shorter wavelengths/higher frequencies than visible light.
Both reflecting and refracting telescopes are designed to gather and focus light to create images of distant objects in space. Reflecting telescopes use mirrors to reflect and concentrate light, while refracting telescopes use lenses to refract and focus light.
We're unable to see your paper, and since you didn't offer any options, we're not able to guess what choices you have.
Telescopes at sea level can observe visible light, radio waves, and a small portion of infrared and ultraviolet light that are able to penetrate the Earth's atmosphere. Other forms of light such as X-rays and gamma rays are absorbed by the atmosphere and cannot be observed at sea level.
Visible light: Telescopes collect photons in the visible light spectrum to observe celestial objects. Infrared radiation: Telescopes sensitive to infrared radiation detect heat emitted by objects in space that are not visible in the visible light spectrum. Radio waves: Radio telescopes capture radio waves emitted by astronomical sources, providing valuable information about the universe.
Radio telescopes and infra-red telescopes operate at longer wavelengths/lower frequencies than visible light. Also, ultraviolet telescopes operate at shorter wavelengths/higher frequencies than visible light.
No, radio telescopes and refracting telescopes have different designs and functions. Radio telescopes are designed to detect radio waves from space, whereas refracting telescopes use lenses to bend light to create images of distant objects. While both types of telescopes have a common goal of observing the universe, their designs are optimized for different wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation.