no or the FBI will kill them cause there master is rich
it was started by the African slaves. it was like rebellion to there slave-master and mock them at the same time.
Slaves were rarely killed by their owners because they were so expensive and valuable.
well the slaves had to clear the lands, work the soil and build the towns that is in the north
He doesn't have a master, he is an assassin and he was hired to kill Shrek by the king on Shrek 2. Until, Shrek Forever After, and Fiona is his master and he was fat.
i have no idea, what so ever!
the slaves master was pharaoh
slaves had a master because they needed them were there was good quality soil for large plantations
He wants to kill him so he could be the "master of the elder wand" (except for the fact that Snape was not ever the master of the elder wand....)
Some slaves thought they would be free if they worked hard, but their masters would just keep them if they worked well. If they were bad their master would kill them, so no, the slaves were not really free.
it was started by the African slaves. it was like rebellion to there slave-master and mock them at the same time.
During the time of slavery, slaves referred to their master as "master" or "massa."
no they didn't slaves where just like housekeepers there job was to clan and be old what to do they couldn't do anything else
yes it would kill the slaves mostly
TBH, I think that slaves gain their master's because they get whipped and slapped if they don't do what they are asked by the master. I mean, a master might bribe the slave into believing and trusting him/her.
the slaves and the master
Abraham Lincoln did not kill any slaves. He worked to free them.
Two types of slaves in ancient Rome were household slaves who worked in the homes of their master, performing domestic duties, and agricultural slaves who worked in the fields and farms belonging to their master.