The phrase "extremism in defense of liberty" suggests that extreme measures may be warranted to protect fundamental freedoms and rights. Proponents argue that in the face of tyranny or oppression, taking bold actions can be necessary to safeguard democracy and individual liberties. However, such extremism can also lead to unintended consequences, including violence and further polarization. Ultimately, the justification for extremism in this context depends on the specific circumstances and the potential impact on society as a whole.
Terrorism is an example of extremism. Please remember not all terrorists and extremists are Muslim there are Christian and Jewish extremists too.
Slavery can never be justified.
The justification of killing often depends on context, moral frameworks, and individual beliefs. In cases such as self-defense, war, or protecting others from imminent harm, some argue that killing can be justified. However, ethical perspectives vary widely, and many believe that taking a life is inherently wrong regardless of circumstances. Ultimately, the question remains deeply complex and subjective, reflecting diverse philosophical, cultural, and legal viewpoints.
no
The song for the Justified season 2 commercials is called Little Lovin' by an artist named Lissie
I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!Acceptance Speech as the 1964 Republican Presidential candidate.Variants and derivatives of this that are often quoted include:Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice. Tolerance in the face of tyranny is no virtue.Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.Moderation in the protection of liberty is no virtue; extremism in the defense of freedom is no vice. Answer from Wikiquote.THE REAL ANSWER: BARRY GOLDWATER SAID THIS IN HIS ACCEPTANCE SPEECH AS THE 1964 REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE.No, the real answer is Marcus Tullius Cicero. It is true that Barry Goldwater usedin in a speech but Cicero is credited with the original.
No extremism is allowed and/or justified in Islam.
Killing someone is not justified unless it is in self-defense or defense of others in imminent danger. If Johnny killed Bob without valid cause, it would not be considered justified.
It means that liberty is so valuable that going to extreme to defend it is not only excusable but admirable.
Extremism in America was created in 1995.
Alliance Defense Fund's motto is 'Defending Our First Liberty'.
No, Islam rejects extremism in all its forms
Extremism is sometimes a euphemism for terrorism.
Homicide is NEVER justified, but the use of deadly force for self-defense is the only acceptable reason for killing another human being. In that case it is classified as "manslaughter."
Any defense can be justified by a lawyer from self defense to insanity. It's up to a judge or jury to believe the justification.
Corruption Religious Extremism Ethnic Extremism Low Education and India, of course :)
In most cases, it is legally justified to shoot someone if they point a gun at you, as it is considered self-defense. However, the specific circumstances of the situation and the laws of the jurisdiction will determine whether the use of lethal force is justified.