No. The Indiana state legislature has never passed a bill that would establish a statewide domestic partnership registry and, as a result, no governor of Indiana has ever had the opportunity to sign or veto such a bill.
Subsidiary Alliance system was established in India during the rule of Governor-General Lord Wellesley from 1798 to 1805. And the first to came under this system was the Nizam of Hyderabad in 1798.
The Lieutenant Governor of Illinois is next in line to Governor of Illinois.If speaking time-wise, this could be the Governor-elect, or a candidate for Governor, who will eventually become Governor-elect then Governor.
governor of jharkhand in 2014
The Governor General represents Her Majesty the Queen at the federal level.In the ten provinces, the Queen is represented by a Lieutenant Governor. The Lieutenant Governor for each province is appointed by the Governor General, on the advice of the prime minister (and in consultation with the province's premier). The Lieutenant Governor performs much of the same functions for the province, as the Governor General would perform for Canada.
As a constitutional monarchy, New Zealand's leader is not the "president" but the Prime Minister.The first New Zealand leader was Henry Sewell, although the title was not "Prime Minister" but "Premier".The term "Prime Minister" was assigned during Richard Seddon's tenure, and the first man to be sworn in under the title of Prime Minister was William Hall-Jones.
No. The Tennessee state legislature has never passed a bill that would legalize domestic partnerships statewide and, as a result, no governor of Tennessee has ever had the opportunity to sign or veto such a bill.
No. The Texas state legislature has never passed a bill that would legalize domestic partnerships statewide and, as a result, no governor of Texas has ever had the opportunity to sign or veto such a bill.
No. The Utah state legislature has never passed a bill that would legalize domestic partnerships statewide and, as a result, no governor of Utah has ever had the opportunity to sign or veto such a bill.
No. The Vermont state legislature has never passed a bill that would legalize domestic partnerships statewide and, as a result, no governor of Vermont has ever had the opportunity to sign or veto such a bill.
No. The Wyoming state legislature has never passed a bill that would legalize domestic partnerships statewide and, as a result, no governor of Wyoming has ever had the opportunity to sign or veto such a bill.
No. The Ohio state legislature has never passed a bill that would legalize domestic partnerships statewide and, as a result, no governor of Ohio has ever had the opportunity to sign or veto such a bill.
Yes, the governor of Minnesota vetoed a domestic partnership bill in May 2010.
No. The South Carolina state legislature has never passed a bill that would legalize domestic partnerships statewide and, as a result, no governor of South Carolina has ever had the opportunity to sign or veto such a bill.
No. The West Virginia state legislature has never passed a bill that would legalize domestic partnerships statewide and, as a result, no governor of West Virginia has ever had the opportunity to sign or veto such a bill.
No. Such a bill was signed into law in April 2004.
No. The Montana state legislature has never passed a bill that would establish a statewide domestic partnership registry and, as a result, no governor of Montana has ever had the opportunity to sign or veto such a bill.
No. The Arizona state legislature has never passed a bill that would establish a statewide domestic partnership registry and, as a result, no governor of Arizona has ever had the opportunity to sign or veto such a bill.