He allowed the Judean aristocracy, which had been deported to Babylon by the Babylonians, to return to Judea to try to reclaim their estates if they wished. Half declined because they were well established in Babylon and stayed. The returnees had mixed success - many could not provide credible evidence to their claim. The successful ones became the new aristocracy in Judea.
The reason they had been deported in the first place was that the Babylonians followed the practice of their predecessors the Assyrians, by exchanging aristocracies of conquered territories so that peoples were ruled by foreigners who were not sympathetic to them and so avoid uprisings. The aristocracies of the 10 northern tribes of Hebrews had been sent by the Assyrians to rule peoples there, and aristocracies from Assyria sent to rule the 10 tribes. The Babylonians did the same thing with the two southern tribes - Judah and Benjamin a century later, and thn incoming Persian Cyrus gave them their chance and came back to take over the two southern tribes. This didn't happen to the northern 10 tribes, giving rise to the fable that the people had disappeared. The common people remained in Israel under foreign rulers in the north. And the common people of the two southern tribes remained in the south.
Hammurabi because of the code and Nebuchadnezzar because of the Hanging gardens.
Nebuchadnezzar left the poor people to remain in the land of Judah (2 Kings 24:14) for an unspecified reason. Jeremiah 39:10 (and 40:10-11) suggest that Nebuchadnezzar didn't intend for Judah to be completely barren. A barren land would provide no tax base and might be infiltrated by foreign elements whom Nebuchadnezzar didn't want there, especially since the new leader of Judah (Gedaliah) told the people to remain loyal to Nebuchadnezzar (Jeremiah 40:9).
the Egypt people which is chalean people
Nebuchadnezzar II
The answer to both questions is No. He destroyed the First Temple, killed myriads of Jews, and exiled the survivors.See also:The Destruction and exile
He was a just king but his assistants made bad assessments in a few occasions. When he was convinced of their bad assessments, he threw them in the lions den. If you want good information on the topic, the best place is the Catholic version of the book of Daniel.
by licking penis
they had a tradition called the heistene where all the conquered people would get feces thrown in their face
Nebuchadnezzar
Nebuchadnezzar II.
how did jdye hehd
The Incas treated the people they conquered by having more emphasis on having those people become loyal Inca subjects.
Nebuchadnezzar II
It attempted to give them peace, prosperity and good government.
Rome treated conquered people generously. The knew the people would be more loyal to the government if treated like Romans.
Bad, but if they are nice, they treat it nicely (but they won't).
He forced many people to move from their homes to faraway lands trying to end the rebellion against him.