answersLogoWhite

0

The Dred Scott contributed to sectionalism by allowing slave owners to bring slaves into free states and still be considered property of the owner. This ruling allowed slavery to be expanded into the new territories and free states.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How did the Dred Scott decision contribute to the tensions leading up to the Civil War?

The Dred Scott decision worsened tensions before the Civil War by ruling that African Americans were not citizens and had no rights, fueling debates over slavery and states' rights.


How did the northerners and southerners react to the Dred Scott decision?

Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.


How did the dred Scott decision of 1857 increase sectionalism in the US?

The Dred Scott decision of 1857 heightened sectionalism by ruling that African Americans could not be citizens and that Congress lacked the authority to prohibit slavery in the territories. This angered abolitionists in the North, who viewed the ruling as a betrayal of democratic principles, while it emboldened pro-slavery advocates in the South. The ruling intensified the existing divide between free and slave states, contributing to the growing tensions that ultimately led to the Civil War. It exemplified the deep-seated conflicts over slavery and states' rights, further polarizing the nation.


How did the Dred Scott decision contribute to the outbreak of the Civil War?

The Dred Scott decision, which ruled that African Americans were not citizens and could not sue in federal court, heightened tensions between the North and South over the issue of slavery. This decision further polarized the country and fueled the growing conflict that eventually led to the outbreak of the Civil War.


What group was benefited most by dred Scott decision?

Southerners benefited the most from the Dred Scott Decision.


What did Stonewall Jackson think of the Dred Scott Decision?

Stonewell Jackson thought Dred Scott Decision was a supid idea


The decision in the Dred Scott case was that .?

Scott was a slave and could not bring suit


What decision in the dred Scott case was that .?

Scott was a slave and could not win suit.


What was decision in the dred Scott case was that?

Scott was a slave and could not win suit.


The dred Scott decision stated that slaves?

the dred scott decision stated that slaves are peoplealso and should'nt be property :D yurwelcomee


Why did the Dred Scott decision alarm Northerners?

The Dred Scott decision declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and ruled that slaves were property. The decision did not necessarily alarm most people in the North.


What decision declared that slaves could not be taken from their masters?

The Dred Scott decision