about 6 or 7
The women supported each other in a boycott to protest the high prices at the market.
Notwithstanding migrations - which are quite difficult to track - Burmese people would normally live in Burma Asia :-D
No one was surprised and when she did it she knew she would be arrested and fined. She paid a fine of five dollars. That evening the churches met and King called for the boycott of the buses. The boycott lasted longer than anyone expected and for many people it was hard for them to get to work. The population of African Americans were the biggest group of riders for the bus services. They had to get a bus from their section of town to the white section and that required using the bus. Many walked and car pools were created, but they were all threatened by whites who wanted to break the boycott and who were biggots. It took a year before the city buses were finally integrated.
French men wear suits that people would normally wear to work everyday and traditional french clothing consists of bells or fertolds
That would depend on where you live but cooperative banks are normally private banks owned by the people (but not the government).
The people put a boycott on tea. boycott - a refusal in buying goods from someone
The boycott is an effective way for disgruntled customers to be heard, because no business can survive when people refuse to buy their products and services.The consumer group decided to boycott the store because of the inaccurate scales at the check outs, which over weighed all produce.The people decided to boycott the company's product
Normally there would have been, but the earthquake took out the ability to warn the people.
Some examples would be Levi's and boycott which both came from names of people
To have a money
Somewhere in the world the blacks boycotted the buses because they were always forced to give up their seat on the bus to a white person if there was no room. They would either have to sit in a different seat, which was normally the back of the bus or they would have to stand. They found this to be unfair so they decided to boycott the buses until they could sit where they wished.
Usually they aren't very effective, but without more details, it's hard to say. There have been a few effective boycotts, when a substantial number of people, or even entire nations, have taken part, but in order for this to happen, you will have to present a pretty convincing reason for people to participate, and a "boycott" is only effective if the people participating would have bought the product/service/whatever in the first place (for instance, getting everyone in the Cat Fancier's Association to boycott Alpo is not likely to make a huge difference, getting them to boycott Fancy Feast might).
The workers ordered a boycott of company goods until their wages were compensated.
Was not boycott should not would not can not will not still not
If most consumers didn't stay away from the company that was being protested against, a boycott would not be successful.
Boycott means a refusal to buy something or use particular services.
The decision to give up my favorite drink for a boycott would depend on the cause behind the boycott and its significance. If the issue aligns with my values and can lead to meaningful change, I would consider making that sacrifice. However, if the boycott does not resonate with me personally, I might choose to support the cause in other ways while still enjoying my favorite drink. Ultimately, the impact of the boycott and its relevance to my principles would guide my choice.